Ab stract:The pur pose of the anal y sis pre sented in the pa per is to iden tify var i ous fac tors, in clud ing eco nomic, so cial, po lit i cal, de mo graphic and cul tural ones, that could shape the dif fer ences in the size of gov ern ment across coun tries and to ver ify their ef fect with the use of ec ono met ric anal y sis. The anal y sis fo cuses on "bud get ary" gov ern ment, usu ally mea sured with some gov ern ment spend ing ra tio, as well as on "non-bud get ary" gov ern ment, mea sured with the in dex of the ex tent of reg u la tion in the econ omy. The re sults of the anal y sis show that eco nomic fac tors are more im por tant in ex plain ing the vari a tion in the size of gov ern ment con sump tion and in the size of non-bud get ary gov ern ment, whereas po lit i cal, so cial and cul tural fac tors are more im por tant in ex plain ing the vari a tion in the size of trans fers. Be sides, the re sults also indicate, that there exists "trade-off" between budgetary and non-budgetary government.Keywords: the size of the gov ern ment, econ o met rics, pol i tics, eco nomic pol icy.JEL Clas si fi ca tion: H11, H60
In tro duc tionOne of the ma jor cur rent is sues in the so cial sci ences is the ex pan sion of gov ern ment in re cent times. Namely, ab so lute and rel a tive size of gov ern ment sec tors grew rap idly in the ma jor ity of in dus trial ised coun tries over the past cen tury.1 It is worth not ing that the lit er a ture on the de ter mi nants af fect ing the growth in size of gov ern ment is quite compre hen sive and nu mer ous ex pla na tions have been de vel oped (e.g., see Lane, 2000;Tanzi and Schuknecht, 2000;Bailey, 2002). The first at tempts to ac count for the ex ceptional pub lic sec tor growth in de vel oped coun tries were the so-called de mand side hypoth e ses. De mand the o ries sug gested among other things that socio-eco nomic de vel opment im plies pub lic re source al lo ca tion, that in creas ing af flu ence im plies larger bud gets, that the dom i nance of the left in so ci ety or gov ern ment would mean bud get expan sion re plac ing mar ket mech a nisms, that col lec tive ide ol o gies would pro mote pub lic sec tor ex pan sion, that sud den so cial shocks ne ces si tated bud get ary shift-points to wards much higher lev els of pub lic spend ing, that wel fare spend ing by neigh bour hood state im plied a de mand for wel fare programmes at home, and that the in creas ing open ness of