1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01050389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peacock and Wiseman on the growth of public expenditure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we have not tested, and cannot exclude, other plausible explanations-including the much discussed role of pressure groups and bureaucrats-our findings assign a non-negligible role to voters' choice. In this respect, notice that Rowley and Tollison (1994) compare Wagner's law with the principle of comparative advantage: the law explains the complementarity between the growth of the industrial economy and the associated growth in demand for public services. In other words, social progress brings about an increase in state activity which in turn means more government expenditure (Henrekson 1993).…”
Section: Presence Of Cross-section Dependencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we have not tested, and cannot exclude, other plausible explanations-including the much discussed role of pressure groups and bureaucrats-our findings assign a non-negligible role to voters' choice. In this respect, notice that Rowley and Tollison (1994) compare Wagner's law with the principle of comparative advantage: the law explains the complementarity between the growth of the industrial economy and the associated growth in demand for public services. In other words, social progress brings about an increase in state activity which in turn means more government expenditure (Henrekson 1993).…”
Section: Presence Of Cross-section Dependencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the de vel oped econ o mies of the world cre ated a de mand for bud get ary sta bi liz ing of the er ratic fluc tu a tions of mar kets (Wag ner, 1883;Pea cock and Wise man, 1961;Wildavsky, 1964;Berry and Lowery, 1987;Alesina and Perrotti, 1995;Payne, 1991;Rowley and Tollison, 1994;Kraan, 1996;Kau and Rubin, 2002). These demand hypotheses may be classified as either economic or political.…”
Section: Fac Tors Of the Size Of Gov Ern Ment In De Vel Oped Coun Triesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those reasons are: (i) when the country is on the industrialized period; (ii) when the economic growth causes an increasing demand of public services; and (iii) government contribution for a capital accumulation in which private sector would not satisfy. Rowley & Tollison (1994) argued that Wagner Law would exist by comparing it with comparative advantage industries of the country which are under government authority. Hence, it can be said that the decreasing of comparative advantage will trigger the public expenditure -GDP ratio to be decreased (Peacock & Scott, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%