1993
DOI: 10.21236/ada266687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peacekeeping, Peacemaking and Peace-Enforcement: The U.S. Role in the New International Order

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Boutros-Ghali, the UN’s Secretary General at the time, used “peace enforcement” to “refer to actions to keep a cease-fire from being violated or to reinstate a failed cease-fire.” Snow emphasizes that “unlike peacekeepers, peace enforcers are often not welcomed by one or either side(s). Rather, they are active fighters who must impose a cease-fire that is opposed by one or both combatants; in the process, the neutrality that distinguishes peacekeepers will most likely be lost.” 17 As Hempson wrote, “The United Nations was forced to expand its understanding of what peacekeeping entailed to include long-term conflict resolution. Peacekeeping quickly evolved from a limited role of symbolic deterrence primarily charged with monitoring an existing cease-fire to an active one that involved in-depth conflict resolution and peace enforcement.…”
Section: End Of the Cold Warmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Boutros-Ghali, the UN’s Secretary General at the time, used “peace enforcement” to “refer to actions to keep a cease-fire from being violated or to reinstate a failed cease-fire.” Snow emphasizes that “unlike peacekeepers, peace enforcers are often not welcomed by one or either side(s). Rather, they are active fighters who must impose a cease-fire that is opposed by one or both combatants; in the process, the neutrality that distinguishes peacekeepers will most likely be lost.” 17 As Hempson wrote, “The United Nations was forced to expand its understanding of what peacekeeping entailed to include long-term conflict resolution. Peacekeeping quickly evolved from a limited role of symbolic deterrence primarily charged with monitoring an existing cease-fire to an active one that involved in-depth conflict resolution and peace enforcement.…”
Section: End Of the Cold Warmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, when the United States or the United Nations intervened in Panama, Haiti, Colombia, Western Sahara, Sierra Leone, Rwanda, Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Kuwait, Cambodia, and East Timor during the post‐Cold War transition, it was more to restore order rather than the balance of power (Barnett 2004). This profound change in motivation helped explain why, in an era when power in the international system was heavily concentrated with the United States and its allies, so many of these peace and stabilization missions turned out to be aborted or frustratingly protracted affairs (Snow 1993; Thakur and Schnabel 2001). With the actors, instruments, and goals all undergoing rapid change, the system was not operating in its customary way.…”
Section: Changing Priorities and Post‐cold War Irmentioning
confidence: 99%