2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.822200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PEAC: An Ultrasensitive and Cost-Effective MRD Detection System in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Using Plasma Specimen

Abstract: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a tumor-derived fraction of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), has emerged as a promising marker in targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in postsurgical patients. However, ctDNA level in early-stage cancers and postsurgical patients is very low, which posed many technical challenges to improve the detection rate and sensitivity, especially in the clinical practice of MRD detection. These challenges usually include insufficient DNA input amount, limit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, one of the biggest challenges in this field is choosing the most suitable assay with which to detect the molecular MRD of lung cancer patients with a high sensitivity and a high specificity. 16 Several assays can be used, and they are briefly described here.A fixed panel assay that tracks driver mutations and targetable gene alterations can be used with a single plasma sample. Alternatively, a personalised panel, requiring previous tumour DNA sequencing, can be used.…”
Section: Techniques For Mrd Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, one of the biggest challenges in this field is choosing the most suitable assay with which to detect the molecular MRD of lung cancer patients with a high sensitivity and a high specificity. 16 Several assays can be used, and they are briefly described here.A fixed panel assay that tracks driver mutations and targetable gene alterations can be used with a single plasma sample. Alternatively, a personalised panel, requiring previous tumour DNA sequencing, can be used.…”
Section: Techniques For Mrd Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there have been several technical challenges in the detection rate and sensitivity of MRD detection since ctDNA levels in early-stage cancers and postsurgical patients are low. Today, an array of sensitive ctDNA detection systems in patients with actionable NSCLC driver gene mutations, such as the Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS), the digital PCR (dPCR)/digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), or the Next-generation sequencing (NGS), have been used to overcome challenges such as insufficient DNA input amount and high costs [37]. These advantages have facilitated the conduction of several studies that are looking at using ctDNA to demonstrate the clinical utility of detecting MRD in driver-mutant NSCLC and treating recurrent disease earlier, and in the following section, we present the most impactful ones.…”
Section: Minimal Residual Disease Ctdna and Oncogene-addicted Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also well documented that L858R mutation has been correlated with a shorter median OS (13.7 months) for mutation carriers versus wild-type patients (27.7 months) [53]. Other researchers used a blocker displacement amplification-derived method as a tool for MRD monitoring, to examine sequential blood samples from an EGFR-mutated NSCLC patient who exhibited no evidence of radiologic recurrence [37]. This patient was then treated with icotinib.…”
Section: Ctdna In the Prognosis Of Egfr-mutant Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LNA is bridged nucleic acid that locks ribose moiety in the 3′-endo conformation, which prevents the cleavage mismatch nucleotide and enhances mismatch discrimination [ 12 ]. BDA uses a DNA oligonucleotide probe with internal three-carbon spacer, which can bind to wild-type DNA and prevent the binding of PCR primer [ 13 , 14 ]. Hence, BDA can limit the amplification of the wild-type alleles and effectively enrich low variant allele frequency (VAF) [ 9 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%