2005
DOI: 10.1179/sre.2005.38.297.218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pdop Values for Simulated GPS/Galileo Positioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of visible satellites and the PDOP values are important indices to reflect the observation environment (Hofmann-Wellenhof et al, 2001;Cederholm, 2005). Figure 2 shows that the observation view was the best because of the presence of fewer obstructions during T2.…”
Section: The Observation Environment During T1 T2 and T3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of visible satellites and the PDOP values are important indices to reflect the observation environment (Hofmann-Wellenhof et al, 2001;Cederholm, 2005). Figure 2 shows that the observation view was the best because of the presence of fewer obstructions during T2.…”
Section: The Observation Environment During T1 T2 and T3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed significant improvements in accuracy and integrity when a integrated constellation is used rather than Galileo alone [13]. The Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP) simulation showed that the mean PDOP values of the integrated GPS/Galileo system are better than that of only GPS [14]. Another simulation result revealed that, given the positioning accuracy, the horizontal positioning availability of GALILEO is comparable to that of GPS, but its vertical positioning availability performs better [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%