2005
DOI: 10.3166/jancl.15.115-135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PDL for ordered trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By reducing it to the original result, [2] show that the same complexity holds for the logic of trees.…”
Section: Theorem 10 ([22])mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By reducing it to the original result, [2] show that the same complexity holds for the logic of trees.…”
Section: Theorem 10 ([22])mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…XPath is a language that allows to define and use relations in a document. XPath is most directly connected with modal logic (see [2]). Research has therefore proceeded by comparing XPath with various variants of modal logic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, regular tree languages are not fully captured by such FO variants (Benedikt and Segoufin, 2005). The work found in (Afanasiev et al, 2005) proposes a variant of Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL) (Fischer and Ladner, 1979) with a similar EXPTIME complexity for reasoning about ordered trees, but whose exact expressive power is still under study.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection between XML navigation and temporal logics was best demonstrated in the work of Marx [25] and his followers [7,1,2,15]. In particular, [25] gave an expressive completeness result for XPath: adding a temporal until operator (found in logics such as LTL, CTL) to the core of XPath gives it precisely the power of FO, one of the yardstick database query languages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%