2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PDE-based spatial smoothing: a practical demonstration of impacts on MRI brain extraction, tissue segmentation and registration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, MR image noise was removed by using a spatially adaptive non-local means filter and MR intensity heterogeneity correction (Xing et al, 2011; Zuo and Xing, 2011). Brain was extracted with a hybrid watershed/surface deformation procedure and was segmented into different tissues such as the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), white matter (WM), and deep gray matter (GM) volumetric structures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, MR image noise was removed by using a spatially adaptive non-local means filter and MR intensity heterogeneity correction (Xing et al, 2011; Zuo and Xing, 2011). Brain was extracted with a hybrid watershed/surface deformation procedure and was segmented into different tissues such as the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), white matter (WM), and deep gray matter (GM) volumetric structures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data preprocessing was composed of anatomical and functional processing steps. The structural preprocessing steps included: 1) removal of MR image noise using a spatially adaptive non-local means filter [36,37]; 2) brain extraction using a hybrid watershed/surface deformation procedure; 3) automated segmentation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), white matter (WM) and deep gray matter (GM) volumetric structures as well as surface reconstruction; and 4) spatial normalization of individual anatomical images to MNI152 standard brain template. The functional preprocessing steps included: 1) removing the first 5 volumes from each scan to allow for signal equilibration; 2) despiking and slice timing correction; 3) motion correction; 4) 4D grand mean intensity normalization; 5) aligning individual functional images to individual anatomical image using the grey-white matter boundary-based registration (BBR) algorithm [38]; 6) registering individual functional images to MNI152 standard template; 7) regressing out the Friston-24 motion time series and mean signals of WM and CSF to reduce the effects of these confounding factors [39, 40]; 8) removing linear and quadratic trends; and 9) spatial smoothing with Gaussian Kernel (FWHM = 6 mm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the anatomical steps were implemented in Freesurfer and FSL: (1) removal of image noise using a spatially adaptive non-local means filter [50,51] , (2) removal of non-brain tissue using a hybrid watershed/surface deformation procedure [52] , (3) automated segmentation of the white matter and deep gray matter volumetric structures (hippocampus, amygdala, caudate, putamen, and ventricles) [53,54] , and (4) a two-step registration of the high-resolution anatomical image to a common stereotaxic space (the Montreal Neurological Institute 152-brain template, MNI152) [55] .…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%