2017
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PD-L1 and PD-1 expression correlate with prognosis in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Abstract: The present study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological significance of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) expression in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC). PD-L1 and PD-1 expression was detected by immunohistochemical methods in 70 ECC formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens and 50 para-carcinoma tissue specimens. The associations of PD-L1 and PD-1 expression with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of ECC patients were explored… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(57 reference statements)
2
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this clinical trial, PD‐L1 positivity was defined as staining in 1% of cells in tumour nests or PD‐L1‐positive bands in the stroma as determined with the 22C3 assay . However, data regarding PD‐L1 expression status in extrahepatic biliary tract cancers are still limited, and the frequency of PD‐L1 expression in bile duct cancer has varied among studies (Table ) . This variability may be explained by multiple factors, including assay method, interpretation method, specimen type (biopsy; surgically resected specimen), and patient demographics (including tumour stage) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this clinical trial, PD‐L1 positivity was defined as staining in 1% of cells in tumour nests or PD‐L1‐positive bands in the stroma as determined with the 22C3 assay . However, data regarding PD‐L1 expression status in extrahepatic biliary tract cancers are still limited, and the frequency of PD‐L1 expression in bile duct cancer has varied among studies (Table ) . This variability may be explained by multiple factors, including assay method, interpretation method, specimen type (biopsy; surgically resected specimen), and patient demographics (including tumour stage) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 However, data regarding PD-L1 expression status in extrahepatic biliary tract cancers are still limited, and the frequency of PD-L1 expression in bile duct cancer has varied among studies (Table 1). [13][14][15][16] This variability may be explained by multiple factors, including assay method, interpretation method, specimen type (biopsy; surgically resected specimen), and patient demographics (including tumour stage). 18,22 Regarding the PD-L1 detection method, currently available tests for PD-L1 expression include commercial assays for clinical trials (22C3, SP263, and SP142), and antibodies labelled as being for research use only (laboratory-developed tests), most commonly the E1L3N antibody.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…High expression of PD‐L1 among other immune checkpoints and of tumour‐specific neoantigens characterized a subset of CCA patients (5.9%, 14/239) with high mutational load and poor prognosis . Both PD‐1 and PD‐L1 are up‐regulated in neoplastic cells, and overexpression is associated with increased invasiveness, poor outcome, and worse disease‐ and metastasis‐free survival, especially when accompanied by low CD3 + or CD8 + infiltrate . Conversely, low PD‐L1 expression (in combination with high MHC‐I expression) was found to be related to favourable prognosis .…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Immune Surveillance and Immune Escapementioning
confidence: 99%