“…The voltammetric profile of the dealloyed catalysts in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 shows the characteristic signature for Pd (Figures A and S11A). A close inspection of the voltammetric profile reveals that (i) the potential corresponding to surface oxide reduction ( E @Pd–O) on the Co 0.02 Cu 13.8 Pd 86.18 surface is more positive than the other two catalysts, (ii) Co 0.55 Cu 24.4 Pd 75.05 and Co 0.2 Cu 4.6 Pd 95.2 catalysts show two anodic peaks in the low-potential region, which can be assigned for the removal of adsorbed hydrogen on (111) and (100) plane of Pd active site, , whereas Co 0.02 Cu 13.8 Pd 86.18 shows a single peak corresponding to the hydrogen desorption from Pd(100) and (iii) two anodic peaks were observed at high positive potential for the oxidation of Pd(100) and Pd(111) surface planes at 0.95 and 1.1 V, respectively. This positive shift in the E @Pd–O for Co 0.02 Cu 13.8 Pd 86.18 catalyst suggests the decreased oxophilicity as well as weakly bonded oxygenated species (OH ad , OOH ad , CO ad ) to Pd surface. , Such positive shift can be accounted for the crystal facets, oxophilicity, and associated geometric and electronic effects.…”