2020
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201905085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PD-1 and BTLA regulate T cell signaling differentially and only partially through SHP1 and SHP2

Abstract: Blockade antibodies of the immunoinhibitory receptor PD-1 can stimulate the anti-tumor activity of T cells, but clinical benefit is limited to a fraction of patients. Evidence suggests that BTLA, a receptor structurally related to PD-1, may contribute to resistance to PD-1 targeted therapy, but how BTLA and PD-1 differ in their mechanisms is debated. Here, we compared the abilities of BTLA and PD-1 to recruit effector molecules and to regulate T cell signaling. While PD-1 selectively recruited SHP2 over the st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
80
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(118 reference statements)
11
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As immune checkpoint receptors, BTLA and PD‐1 signaling appear to play independent roles in inhibiting γδ T cell proliferation and cytotoxicity, respectively, and they had no additive effect on each other. In a recent report, BTLA and PD‐1 regulate T cell signaling differentialy and only partially through SHP‐1 and SHP‐2, 44 that supports our study. In Terms of activating signaling, dual inhibition of BTLA and PD‐1 increased pAKT, compared with that of BTLA single blockade, implying the importance of BTLA signaling in γδ T cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As immune checkpoint receptors, BTLA and PD‐1 signaling appear to play independent roles in inhibiting γδ T cell proliferation and cytotoxicity, respectively, and they had no additive effect on each other. In a recent report, BTLA and PD‐1 regulate T cell signaling differentialy and only partially through SHP‐1 and SHP‐2, 44 that supports our study. In Terms of activating signaling, dual inhibition of BTLA and PD‐1 increased pAKT, compared with that of BTLA single blockade, implying the importance of BTLA signaling in γδ T cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) is selectively expressed on Th1 cells and has been identified as an immune checkpoint receptor. Upon BTLA binding to herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), the BTLA cytoplasmic domains ITIM and ITSM bind to and activate the tyrosine phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2, which leads to the inhibition of lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (LCK)-dependent T-cell activation [39,40]. Additionally, the third domain Grb-2-recognition motif in BTLA can recognize the Grb-2 protein, subsequently recruiting the PI3K protein subunit p85, stimulating the PI3K signaling pathway, and finally promoting cell proliferation and survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many in vitro studies indicate the important role of SHP-2 in PD-1-mediated T-cell suppression, recent in vivo study using T cell-specific SHP-2-deficient mice suggests that SHP-2 is dispensable for T-cell exhaustion and for PD-1 signaling [70]. Consistently, another recent research indicates that PD-1 can suppress T-cell signaling by a mechanism independent of both SHP-1 and SHP-2 [71]. These reports suggest that redundant mechanisms other than SHP-1 and SHP-2 may exist to mediate the immune inhibitory function downstream of PD-1.…”
Section: Pd-1/pd-l1-related Cell Signaling and The Control Of Pd-1/pdmentioning
confidence: 93%