2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2004.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCR-enzyme immunoassay of rDNA in the diagnosis of candidemia and comparison with amplicon detection by agarose gel electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple studies have evaluated the performance of PCR tests for the diagnosis of invasive Candida infections in patient populations (4,118,(185)(186)(187)(188)(189)(190)(191)(192)(193)(194)(195)(196)(197)(198)(199)(200)(201)(202) (studies are summarized in Table 5). The ranges of reported sensitivity and specificity values are 56.2 to 100% and 54 to 100%, respectively.…”
Section: Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple studies have evaluated the performance of PCR tests for the diagnosis of invasive Candida infections in patient populations (4,118,(185)(186)(187)(188)(189)(190)(191)(192)(193)(194)(195)(196)(197)(198)(199)(200)(201)(202) (studies are summarized in Table 5). The ranges of reported sensitivity and specificity values are 56.2 to 100% and 54 to 100%, respectively.…”
Section: Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences should be considered fundamental, as accuracy values may change significantly depending on the way that each study handles cases of probable and possible invasive candidiasis. Interestingly, many studies show a tendency of PCR methods to detect Candida DNA in patients at high risk of invasive candidiasis with negative blood culture (187,189,202). In some cases of discordant results between blood cultures and PCR, Candida spp.…”
Section: Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome these difficulties, non-culture methods have been developed. With these methods, highly sensitive and specific detection of fungal DNA from clinical materials has been demonstrated (Maaroufi et al, 2003;Ahmad et al, 2004). However, technical problems such as the risk of contamination and the inability to distinguish colonized cases from infected patients may need to be solved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of carbohydrate assimilation profiles obtained by ID32C and a Vitek 2 yeast identification system, the isolates were identified as C. famata. For molecular identification, the genomic DNA from the isolates was prepared as described previously (1). The internally transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) was amplified and sequenced as described previously (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%