2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-004-1200-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCR diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii on sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage samples in immuno-compromised patients

Abstract: The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique was compared with Wright-Giemsa (WG), Gomori methenamine silver (GMS) stains and an immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for detection of Pneumocystis carinii in immuno-compromised patients. Specimens of 21 bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) and 139 sputum samples, were obtained from 157 patients (38 with AIDS and 119 with HIV) from four hospitals in Khon Kaen, Thailand. A true positive required at least two positives by techniques considered gold standard tests. Eleven (52.3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the positive samples, 13 were microscopy-positive and PCR-negative, whereas 24 samples were microscopy-negative and PCRpositive. Pinlaor et al (2004) compared Wright-Giemsa and Gomori's methenamine silver staining methods with PCR targeting 5S rRNA in 160 respiratory specimens. The incidence of P. jirovecii was 10 % by both microscopy methods and 15.6 % by PCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the positive samples, 13 were microscopy-positive and PCR-negative, whereas 24 samples were microscopy-negative and PCRpositive. Pinlaor et al (2004) compared Wright-Giemsa and Gomori's methenamine silver staining methods with PCR targeting 5S rRNA in 160 respiratory specimens. The incidence of P. jirovecii was 10 % by both microscopy methods and 15.6 % by PCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To diagnose PcP, various P. jirovecii genes were targeted by PCR, such as major surface glycoprotein (MSG) (Huang et al, 1999;Fischer et al, 2001;Helweg-Larsen et al, 2002;Larsen et al, 2002bLarsen et al, , 2004Flori et al, 2004;Linssen et al, 2006;Fillaux et al, 2008), dihydropteroate synthase (Demanche et al, 2001;AlvarezMartínez et al, 2006;Linssen et al, 2006;Jiancheng et al, 2009), dihydrofolate reductase (Schluger et al, 1991;Lu et al, 1995;Larsen et al, 2002a;Bandt & Monecke, 2007), internal transcribed spacer regions of the rRNA (Lu et al, 1995;Torres et al, 2000), mitochondrial large subunit rRNA (mtLSU rRNA) (Wakefield et al, 1990;Leibovitz et al, 1995;Lu et al, 1995;Wakefield, 1996;Huang et al, 1999;Kaiser et al, 2001;Olsson et al, 2001;Helweg-Larsen et al, 2002;Flori et al, 2004;Gupta et al, 2009;Jiancheng et al, 2009;Choukri et al, 2010), mitochondrial smallsubunit rRNA (Hunter & Wakefield, 1996;Helweg-Larsen et al, 2002), 5S rRNA (Kitada et al, 1991;Wakefield et al, 1991;Lu et al, 1995;Ribes et al, 1997;Sandhu et al, 1999;Pinlaor et al, 2004), 18S rRNA …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, lack of standardization and clinical validation of the laboratory-developed assays is the primary reason why the EORTC/MSG group decided to omit all fungal PCR from the definitions of invasive fungal diseases (7). In addition, several papers attest to the fact that PCR diagnosis of PCP is more sensitive than microscopy (4,10,11,13,22,24). The generally higher sensitivity of PCR assays than of microscopy may be disproportionately important for non-AIDS patients and may result in fewer missed clinical diagnoses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TBO: azul de toluidina O; PM: metenamina de plata; IFD: inmunofluorescencia directa Las razones mencionadas no parecen afectar la inmunofluorescencia directa para detectar P. jirovecii. Además, esta técnica permite identificar casos adicionales porque los anticuerpos monoclonales dirigidos contra los antígenos de superficie de Pneumocystis, detectan tanto formas quísticas como formas tróficas (éstas constituyen las formas más abundantes al inicio de la neumonía), mientras que el azul de toluidina O identifica sólo las formas quísticas (29,30,(41)(42)(43). Asimismo, debido a que la especificidad de la reacción inmunitaria resalta las estructuras del hongo en la placa, su lectura es más sencilla que la del azul de toluidina O (44).…”
Section: Inmunofluorescencia Directa Enunclassified