2018
DOI: 10.1186/s41182-018-0100-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCR-based detection of Plasmodium falciparum in saliva using mitochondrial cox3 and varATS primers

Abstract: BackgroundSampling of saliva for diagnosing Plasmodium falciparum infections is a safe, non-invasive alternative to sampling of blood. However, the use of saliva presents a challenge because lower concentrations of parasite DNA are present in saliva compared to peripheral blood. Therefore, a sensitive method is needed for detection of parasite DNA in saliva. This study utilized two recently reported “ultra-sensitive” PCR assays based on detection of the P. falciparum mitochondrial cox3 gene and the multi-copy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the sensitivity of any PCR protocol depends largely on the molecular target used [40], the high copy number of Pfr364 (around 20 copies of “subfamily 1” targeted by specific primers) probably facilitated the detection of low levels of P. falciparum in co-infections as compared to 18S rRNA (around 5–8 copies). Although different multi-copy targets have been described as sensitive for molecular diagnosis of malaria [23, 25, 36], those studies did not investigate the reliability of these targets in mixed-malaria infections, which precludes any potential comparison with results described here. In addition, most of the studies have been carried-out in endemic areas, such as Papua New Guinea, that currently does not represent an unstable and low-transmission endemic area [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the sensitivity of any PCR protocol depends largely on the molecular target used [40], the high copy number of Pfr364 (around 20 copies of “subfamily 1” targeted by specific primers) probably facilitated the detection of low levels of P. falciparum in co-infections as compared to 18S rRNA (around 5–8 copies). Although different multi-copy targets have been described as sensitive for molecular diagnosis of malaria [23, 25, 36], those studies did not investigate the reliability of these targets in mixed-malaria infections, which precludes any potential comparison with results described here. In addition, most of the studies have been carried-out in endemic areas, such as Papua New Guinea, that currently does not represent an unstable and low-transmission endemic area [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although major advances have been reached for the molecular detection of malaria parasites [25, 26, 36, 37], most sensitive PCR-based assays require high-volume of venous blood and complex sample processing [8, 23, 38, 39], being not feasible in the context of malaria routine surveillance. The current study involved investigate the hypothesis that the amplification of both ribosomal and non-ribosomal multi-copy PCR targets could increase the chances of detecting low parasite density and mixed P. falciparum and P. vivax infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is however capable of identifying low-level parasitaemia that are otherwise undetectable by other methods, and distinguishing between individual parasite species. Recent developments in PCR applications have signaled the potential of non-invasive malaria diagnostic options, such as those relying on DNA detection in saliva, urine, sweat, and even faecal excreta [1921]. Besides, real time PCR assays enable quantitative assessments and comparison of infection loads [15], but are expensive for most laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is however capable of identifying low-level parasitaemia that are otherwise undetectable by other methods, and distinguishing between individual parasite species. Recent developments in PCR applications have signaled the potential of non-invasive malaria diagnostic options such as those relying on DNA detection in saliva, urine, sweat and even fecal excreta [19][20][21]. Besides, real time PCR assays enable quantitative assessments and comparison of infection loads [15], but are expensive for most laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%