2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.01.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCR-based assessment of shellfish traceability and sustainability in international Mediterranean seafood markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Information on the details of commercial practices and providers is unfortunately currently unavailable. These percentages are slightly higher than those previously published in other recently conducted cephalopod studies . This result, even if not completely representative of the global cephalopod market (due to the limitations in the sampling), raises serious concerns and prompts wider traceability studies by the responsible regulatory agencies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Information on the details of commercial practices and providers is unfortunately currently unavailable. These percentages are slightly higher than those previously published in other recently conducted cephalopod studies . This result, even if not completely representative of the global cephalopod market (due to the limitations in the sampling), raises serious concerns and prompts wider traceability studies by the responsible regulatory agencies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…DNA testing of cephalopod food products and ingredients is an effective strategy to identify and authenticate species, detect contaminants or adulterants, and verify label claims. This strategy can also support traceability regulations and prevent food fraud and health problems . Previous studies have reported over 20% of ambiguity and attempts to mislead consumers by using incorrect labels when buying products labeled with the commercial name Galician octopus, which is used to legally protect this high value‐added product in national and international markets .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a minimum detection limit of 0.1-0.01% (w/w) for meat products was found in various literatures (Karabasanavar et al, 2013;Ali et al, 2014;Amaral et al, 2015;. Some other workers, especially by real-time PCR and other PCR methods, could even detected <0.01% (w/w) in the adulterated meat mixtures (Kesmen et al, 2012;Cho et al, 2014;Floren et al, 2015). However, the second approach is most preferred since it is closer to the actual conditions of meat adulteration in the market.…”
Section: Sensitivity Testmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Mislabeling of food products has been mentioned as a major public health risk associated with food safety in the food market in 17 of the full-text articles included in this review [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82]154]. Mislabeling of food products includes false advertising, deliberately or accidentally leaving out ingredients, not listing potential health effects, and claiming a food contains ingredients that it does not for financial gain with the intent of deceiving the consumer regarding what is actually in the package [155].…”
Section: Sood M 2014 [67] Indonesia Field Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%