1997
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCNA and DNA Polymerase δ Catalytic Subunit fromSchizosaccharomyces pombeDo Not Interact Directly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results are in full agreement with the report of a lack of interaction between S. cerevisiae PCNA and p125 (37). In those studies co-immunoprecipitation of yeast PCNA and p125 co-expressed in insect cells was initially investigated by using an antibody specific to either PCNA or p125 and confirmed by reciprocal experiments using the antibodies against the partner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present results are in full agreement with the report of a lack of interaction between S. cerevisiae PCNA and p125 (37). In those studies co-immunoprecipitation of yeast PCNA and p125 co-expressed in insect cells was initially investigated by using an antibody specific to either PCNA or p125 and confirmed by reciprocal experiments using the antibodies against the partner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Binding studies using recombinant human p125 and PCNA have demonstrated direct interaction between these two polypeptides by protein overlay experiments using biotinylated PCNA and by biochemical cross-linking experiments (33); however, pulldown assays using PCNA-linked beads have yielded both positive (34) and negative (35) results with respect to the binding of PCNA and p125. Similar studies with S. cerevisiae (30,36) and S. pombe (37,38) pol ␦ failed to detect any interaction between PCNA and the catalytic subunits of the yeast enzymes. The small subunits of pol ␦ from both budding yeast (Pol31) and mammalian (p50) sources were found not to directly bind PCNA (30,33,34,36).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…However, direct binding of PCNA to the large subunit as well as the second subunit of Pol ␦ has also been demonstrated (30 -33), although other studies failed to detect such interactions, suggesting that they are likely quite weak (10,24,31,(33)(34)(35). To determine to what extent the PCNA-binding domain of Pol32 is responsible for the interaction between the threesubunit Pol ␦ and PCNA, we carried out native gel electrophoresis of several reconstituted Pol ␦ complexes as well as surface plasmon resonance analysis of one particular mutant Pol ␦-10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PI3K signaling is activated in human cancers via several different mechanisms, including direct mutational activation or amplification of genes encoding key components of the PI3K pathway such as PIK3CA and AKT1 or loss of PTEN (3,9). The role of several PI3K subunits in tumor development and metastasis has been well-investigated, including p110a, p110b, p85a, and p85b (10)(11)(12). But even now, the role and function of PIK3R3 in tumor metastasis still remain to be little known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%