2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCDD/F enviromental impact from municipal solid waste bio-drying plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this frame the environmental impact of an incinerator depends on many factors:  Site characteristics (the local climatology strongly affects the local impact);  Amount of residual MSW (RMSW) to be treated (the off-gas flow-rate is proportional to the amount of RMSW burnt, if its characteristics are steady);  Lower Heating Value (LHV) of the RMSW (this parameter influence the off-gas flow-rate);  Emission concentrations at the stack during operating conditions (keeping steady the off-gas flow-rate, the release of pollutants at the stack is proportional to the pollutants concentrations at the emission);  Stack height (a higher stack fosters the pollutants dilution into the atmosphere);  Off-gas velocity at the stack (higher values of this parameter favor the dilution);  Off-gas temperature at the stack (this parameter is limited by the need of performing energy recovery, but it is clear that higher values foster dilution into the atmosphere);  Yearly operating hours (keeping steady the amount of waste to be fed, a shorter working period causes an increase of the waste flow-rate, with consequences on the peaks of impact). In the literature, an analysis of the effects of the operating hours scheduling is not common both for thermochemical processes [4,5] and for biochemical processes [6][7][8][9][10][11]. The aim of this paper is to go beyond the analyses based on overall balances [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this frame the environmental impact of an incinerator depends on many factors:  Site characteristics (the local climatology strongly affects the local impact);  Amount of residual MSW (RMSW) to be treated (the off-gas flow-rate is proportional to the amount of RMSW burnt, if its characteristics are steady);  Lower Heating Value (LHV) of the RMSW (this parameter influence the off-gas flow-rate);  Emission concentrations at the stack during operating conditions (keeping steady the off-gas flow-rate, the release of pollutants at the stack is proportional to the pollutants concentrations at the emission);  Stack height (a higher stack fosters the pollutants dilution into the atmosphere);  Off-gas velocity at the stack (higher values of this parameter favor the dilution);  Off-gas temperature at the stack (this parameter is limited by the need of performing energy recovery, but it is clear that higher values foster dilution into the atmosphere);  Yearly operating hours (keeping steady the amount of waste to be fed, a shorter working period causes an increase of the waste flow-rate, with consequences on the peaks of impact). In the literature, an analysis of the effects of the operating hours scheduling is not common both for thermochemical processes [4,5] and for biochemical processes [6][7][8][9][10][11]. The aim of this paper is to go beyond the analyses based on overall balances [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal efficiencies of biofilters, for instance, coupled with the low velocity of the outgoing air, do not offer an appropriate dilution of the pollutants emitted into the atmosphere; in addition, biofilters are usually located at ground level. As a consequence, due to the absence of chimneys to increase the release height, the impacts of MBTs like bio-drying and biostabilization on ambient air concentration and atmospheric deposition to soil may be comparable with the impacts generated by the newest municipal waste incinerators [33,35]. In fact, even though the emissions from MBTs are lower, their impact on the population may be even higher both for the configurations of the usual removal technologies and due to the possible presence of fields, pastures and dwellings in the surroundings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with respect to the impacts on human health, the choice of the best treatment from the environmental point of view should not be limited by the results of an LCA. Evidences coming from dispersion simulations based on the typical emission factors for the air treatment systems usually adopted by mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) plants show potentially high impacts on the surrounding areas [32][33][34]. The removal efficiencies of biofilters, for instance, coupled with the low velocity of the outgoing air, do not offer an appropriate dilution of the pollutants emitted into the atmosphere; in addition, biofilters are usually located at ground level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results presented will be useful for achieving an improved understanding of the typical surface wind and ABL processes affecting air quality Gohm et al, 2009;Palau et al, 2005;Pérez-Landa et al, 2007;Rada et al, 2011;Ragazzi et al, 2013;Schnitzhofer et al, 2009), urban weather and climate (Giovannini et al, 2011(Giovannini et al, , 2013a(Giovannini et al, , 2014, turbulent fluxes ) and atmospheric convection leading to precipitation events (Bertò et al, 2004;Kalthoff et al, 2009;Eigenmann et al, 2009;Pucillo et al, 2009) in the study area. For example, in the warm season the Ora del Garda arrival in the afternoon may plausibly be expected to reduce the concentration of (locally emitted) pollutants and mitigate the temperature in the densely populated urban areas north of Trento.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%