Abstract:In order to investigate the dioxin emission levels of hazardous waste incinerators (HWIs), and estimate their emission factors to the atmosphere, flue gas samples were collected from 12 HWIs in China, and analyzed for polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs). Eleven HWIs are located in the south-eastern coastal areas of China, with rotary kilns being is the most widely used type of incinerator (more than 50% of the units), followed by pyrolysis kilns. Eleven incinerators had their emission… Show more
“…The MSWIs without activated carbon injection exhibited higher PCDD/F emission factors (1.18 µg I-TEQ ton-waste -1 ) than those with activated carbon injection (0.711 µg I-TEQ ton-waste -1 ) in the study of Ni et al (2009). Wang et al (2014) also shows that without activated carbon the emission factors were nearly three times higher for HWIs. The combination of dry scrubber (DS), activated carbon injection (ACI) and fabric filter (FF), where the ACI adsorb the gas-phase PCDD/Fs and FF provided particle-phase PCDD/Fs removal, is treated as best available control technology for PCDD/Fs in flue gases, as reported in Lee et al (2003).…”
Section: Pcdd/f Emissions From Waste Incineratorsmentioning
This overview attempts to outline what we currently know about the PCDD/F emission inventories and the source categories therein. Besides the best available control techniques, suggestions are offered on how to reduce the PCDD/F emission factors and emission quantity of some important PCDD/F emission sources. The PCDD/F combustion sources can be classified as either stationary or mobile or minimally/uncontrolled combustion sources. The major stationary sources of PCDD/Fs are metal production processes, waste incineration, heat and power plants, and fly ash treatment plant. Crematories, vehicles, residential boilers and stoves are of key concern due to their proximity to residential areas and their relatively lower lying stacks and exhaust gases, which may result in great impact to their surrounding environment.Moreover, we offered our perspectives on how to improve the quality and representative of the PCDD/F emission factors to attain PCDD/F inventories which correspond more to reality. These points of view include: (1) PCDD/F contributions during start-up procedures of MSWIs should be considered, (2) the sampling times of stack flue gases for EAFs and secondary metal smelters should correspond to whole smelting process stages, (3) longer flue gas sampling time should be executed for power plants, (4) direct exhaust samplings from tailpipes for mobile sources, (5) development of an open burn testing facility that can reflect the real open burning conditions, and (6) long-term sampling techniques like AMESA are suggested to used exclusively for the most contributed PCDD/F stationary sources.
“…The MSWIs without activated carbon injection exhibited higher PCDD/F emission factors (1.18 µg I-TEQ ton-waste -1 ) than those with activated carbon injection (0.711 µg I-TEQ ton-waste -1 ) in the study of Ni et al (2009). Wang et al (2014) also shows that without activated carbon the emission factors were nearly three times higher for HWIs. The combination of dry scrubber (DS), activated carbon injection (ACI) and fabric filter (FF), where the ACI adsorb the gas-phase PCDD/Fs and FF provided particle-phase PCDD/Fs removal, is treated as best available control technology for PCDD/Fs in flue gases, as reported in Lee et al (2003).…”
Section: Pcdd/f Emissions From Waste Incineratorsmentioning
This overview attempts to outline what we currently know about the PCDD/F emission inventories and the source categories therein. Besides the best available control techniques, suggestions are offered on how to reduce the PCDD/F emission factors and emission quantity of some important PCDD/F emission sources. The PCDD/F combustion sources can be classified as either stationary or mobile or minimally/uncontrolled combustion sources. The major stationary sources of PCDD/Fs are metal production processes, waste incineration, heat and power plants, and fly ash treatment plant. Crematories, vehicles, residential boilers and stoves are of key concern due to their proximity to residential areas and their relatively lower lying stacks and exhaust gases, which may result in great impact to their surrounding environment.Moreover, we offered our perspectives on how to improve the quality and representative of the PCDD/F emission factors to attain PCDD/F inventories which correspond more to reality. These points of view include: (1) PCDD/F contributions during start-up procedures of MSWIs should be considered, (2) the sampling times of stack flue gases for EAFs and secondary metal smelters should correspond to whole smelting process stages, (3) longer flue gas sampling time should be executed for power plants, (4) direct exhaust samplings from tailpipes for mobile sources, (5) development of an open burn testing facility that can reflect the real open burning conditions, and (6) long-term sampling techniques like AMESA are suggested to used exclusively for the most contributed PCDD/F stationary sources.
“…Therefore, the PCDD/F content in the ashes generated in an LW incinerator are five to ten times higher than those in municipal solid waste (MSW) incinerators (Wang et al, 2010;Liao et al, 2014). Similar levels have been found in hazardous waste incinerators due to the complicated composition of the input materials (Coutinho et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2014). High PCDD/F exposure is a health risk .…”
This study describes polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran (PCDD/F) behavior during the co-incineration of elutriated mixed incinerator ashes with laboratory waste. The input and output materials during elutriation and incineration processes were sampled and analyzed using a high-resolution gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry assay. The elutriation process mainly washed out soluble salts and thus resulted in an increase in the level of PCDD/F in the mixed incinerator ashes. After co-incineration with laboratory waste, the PCDD/F concentration of the flue gas met the regulated standard in Taiwan, and the PCDD/F mainly existed as a particulate phase. However, the PCDD/F levels in fly ashes that included elutriated ash in the incinerator were higher than those of fly ashes without it. The coincineration output-mass/input-mass ratio of elutriated ash with laboratory waste was 0.34. According to the X-ray diffraction analysis results and scanning electron microscopy images, the main crystalline phase of the fly ashes was NaCl. The NaCl came from the reaction of HCl in the flue gas and the NaOH injected in the quenching tower after treatment in the co-incineration system.
“…A recent surge of research on PCDD/Fs and PCBs has given us new information and challenges in Asia (Lin et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2014). This study (that is, the part II.)…”
The wet deposition flux increased with stronger rainfall intensity. From the congener profiles of PCDD/F and PCB WHO-TEQ 2005 total deposition fluxes, 2,3,4,7, 2,3,4,6,7, 1,2,3,4,7,2,3,7,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.