“…We also evaluated PBLH from the retrievals in comparison to ECMWF for the same land, daytime test profiles. While many approaches can be used to evaluate PBLH and the best choice is typically regime-dependent, we used a vertical gradient approach similar to Seidel et al (Seidel, Ao, & Li, 2010).While relative humidity gradient is one quantity which has previously been used to evaluate PBLH (Ding, Iredell, Theobald, Wei, & Meyer, 2021), we evaluated gradients in both 𝑞 and 𝑇 𝑝𝑜𝑡 individually, as both are useful indicators of the PBL top as illustrated in Figure 1, and both are more directly related to the variables retrieved by the algorithms. We also check PBLH derived from 𝑞 against the PBLH derived from 𝑇 𝑝𝑜𝑡 to confirm whether they are mutually consistent as physically expected.…”