2010
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pb-induced cellular defense system in the root meristematic cells of Allium sativum L

Abstract: BackgroundElectron microscopy (EM) techniques enable identification of the main accumulations of lead (Pb) in cells and cellular organelles and observations of changes in cell ultrastructure. Although there is extensive literature relating to studies on the influence of heavy metals on plants, Pb tolerance strategies of plants have not yet been fully explained. Allium sativum L. is a potential plant for absorption and accumulation of heavy metals. In previous investigations the effects of different concentrati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
70
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(54 reference statements)
6
70
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For most plant species, the majority of absorbed lead (approximately 95% or more) is accumulated in the roots, and only a small fraction is translocated to aerial plant parts, as has been reported in Vicia faba, Pisum sativum, and Phaseolus vulgaris (Piechalak et al 2002;Małecka et al 2008;Shahid et al 2011), V. unguiculata (Kopittke et al 2007), Nicotiana tabacum, (Gichner et al 2008), Lathyrus sativus (Brunet et al 2009), Zea mays (Gupta et al 2009), Avicennia marina (Yan et al 2010), non-accumulating Sedum alfredii (Gupta et al 2010), and Allium sativum (Jiang and Liu 2010). Although many metals display the translocation restriction phenomenon mentioned above, this phenomenon is not common to all heavy metals.…”
Section: Lead Accumulation In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For most plant species, the majority of absorbed lead (approximately 95% or more) is accumulated in the roots, and only a small fraction is translocated to aerial plant parts, as has been reported in Vicia faba, Pisum sativum, and Phaseolus vulgaris (Piechalak et al 2002;Małecka et al 2008;Shahid et al 2011), V. unguiculata (Kopittke et al 2007), Nicotiana tabacum, (Gichner et al 2008), Lathyrus sativus (Brunet et al 2009), Zea mays (Gupta et al 2009), Avicennia marina (Yan et al 2010), non-accumulating Sedum alfredii (Gupta et al 2010), and Allium sativum (Jiang and Liu 2010). Although many metals display the translocation restriction phenomenon mentioned above, this phenomenon is not common to all heavy metals.…”
Section: Lead Accumulation In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…There are several reasons why the transport of lead from roots to aerial plant parts is limited. These reasons include immobilization by negatively charged pectins within the cell wall (Islam et al 2007;Kopittke et al 2007;Arias et al 2010), precipitation of insoluble lead salts in intercellular spaces (Kopittke et al 2007;Islam et al 2007;Meyers et al 2008;Małecka et al 2008), accumulation in plasma membranes (Seregin et al 2004;Islam et al 2007;Jiang and Liu 2010), or sequestration in the vacuoles of rhizodermal and cortical cells (Seregin et al 2004;Kopittke et al 2007). …”
Section: Lead Accumulation In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several reasons why the transport of lead from roots to aerial plant parts is limited. These reasons include immobilization by negatively charged pectins within the cell wall, precipitation of insoluble lead salts in intercellular spaces (Islam et al 2007;Kopittke et al 2007), accumulation in plasma membranes (Islam et al 2007;Jiang & Liu 2010;Seregin et al 2004), or sequestration in the vacuoles of rhizodermal and cortical cells (Kopittke et al 2007;Seregin et al 2004). However, these reasons are not sufficient to explain the low rate of lead translocation from root to shoot.…”
Section: Assay Of Lead Content In Different Plant Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em condições de exposição ao Pb, a atividade dos meristemas radiculares tende a diminuir em plantas não tolerantes (Pereira et al, 2013a) podendo demonstrar várias injúrias estruturais (Jiang & Liu, 2010). Desta forma, o aumento na proporção de floema no cilindro vascular das raízes de E. grandiflorus pode ser um importante mecanismo de defesa ao Pb, uma vez que permite manter a alocação de fotoassimilados para o crescimento das raízes.…”
Section: B Cunclassified