2015
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pazopanib in pretreated advanced neuroendocrine tumors: a phase II, open-label trial of the Spanish Task Force Group for Neuroendocrine Tumors (GETNE)

Abstract: NCT01280201.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
65
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sunitinib is an approved therapy in progressive pancreatic NET based on prolongation of PFS by 6 months compared with placebo (median PFS 11.4 months with sunitinib vs 5.5 months on placebo; Raymond et al 2011). Circulating cytokines (interleukin-8, soluble VEGFR-3 and stromal cell-derived factor-1α) and circulating tumor cells have been associated with outcome to sunitinib and pazopanib therapy (Ebos et al 2007, Grande et al 2015, Zurita et al 2015, but none of these markers is validated or established in clinical practice. There is no definite evidence of efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in nonpancreatic NET yet, although phase II trials indicate some efficacy of novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors (pazopanib, axitinib) , Strosberg et al 2016.…”
Section: :11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sunitinib is an approved therapy in progressive pancreatic NET based on prolongation of PFS by 6 months compared with placebo (median PFS 11.4 months with sunitinib vs 5.5 months on placebo; Raymond et al 2011). Circulating cytokines (interleukin-8, soluble VEGFR-3 and stromal cell-derived factor-1α) and circulating tumor cells have been associated with outcome to sunitinib and pazopanib therapy (Ebos et al 2007, Grande et al 2015, Zurita et al 2015, but none of these markers is validated or established in clinical practice. There is no definite evidence of efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in nonpancreatic NET yet, although phase II trials indicate some efficacy of novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors (pazopanib, axitinib) , Strosberg et al 2016.…”
Section: :11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the moment, there is insufficient evidence supporting the use of other targeted therapies, such as bevacizumab, sorafenib, pazopanib, or axitinib, in the treatment of pancreatic NENs [222][223][224].…”
Section: Szkolenie Podyplomowementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pazopanib has been investigated in several single-arm phase II studies in pancreatic and extrapancreatic NETs, with PFS ranging from 9.1 to 14.4 months (60)(61)(62). A placebo-controlled randomized phase II clinical trial, A021202, is ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of pazopanib in progressive well-differentiated non-pancreatic NETs (NCT01841736).…”
Section: Sunitinib and Anti-angiogenicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, SDF-1α, or CXCL12, is a chemokine that binds its receptor CXCR4 to promote vascular endothelial cell migration during neovascularization and also promotes leukocyte chemotaxis (65). In another phase II study of pazopanib in patients with pancreatic or non-pancreatic well-differentiated NETs, there were non-significant trends toward improved PFS in patients with no baseline circulating tumor cells, lower soluble-VEGFR2 levels, absence of the VEGFR3 rs307821 (R1324L) polymorphism, a n d a b s e n c e o f t h e V E G F R 3 r s 3 0 7 8 2 6 ( T 4 9 4 A ) polymorphism (61). The results were not significant, though could be underpowered.…”
Section: Sunitinib and Anti-angiogenicsmentioning
confidence: 99%