« Paysage patrimonial » ou « paysages patrimoniaux » ?

Gillot, Laurence; Maffi, Irène; Trémon, Anne-Christine

doi:10.7202/1026546ar

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 21 publications

(13 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Appadurai's concept of "-scape" then seems to offer some positive prospects in analyzing a "global cultural form" (Di Giovane 2009, p. 29). The concept has caught on and generated subsequent work (see for example, Gillot et al 2013;Winter 2015). This body of work focuses on such processes as "heritage-making" and heritage as contingent rather than as a fixed entity or "legacy" passed on unchanging from one generation to another (Hitchcock and King 2003); In this connection, Esposito refers to the processes of "l'invention" and "la fabrication" in her detailed study of Siem-Reap-Angkor (2011).…”

Section: Heritage-scapesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this approach, heritage and heritage sites are conceptualized as a focus of negotiation, contention, conflict, accommodation and marginalization (and see Logan 2012;Daly and Winter 2012). These processes have subsequently been captured in the concepts of "patrimonialization" and "heritagization", comprising historically situated projects and procedures with the purpose of capturing something that is defined as a legacy from the past but transforming places, sites, locations and the peoples associated with them into "heritage" (Gillot et al 2013). Unfortunately, the complex interactions between the stakeholders in designated places or sites which are perceived as something to be valued and protected, and in the margins of these sites, are rarely studied in detail (Ong 2010).…”

Section: Heritage-scapesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

World Heritage Sites and their Margins in Southeast Asian Tourism Development: Heritage-scapes or Non-heritage Spaces?

King¹

2018

AJTR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since UNESCO's inscription of the first World Heritage Sites in Southeast Asia in the early 1990s, heritage tourism has become big business. What trajectories would tourism development follow in Cambodia without Angkor, or in Malaysia without Melaka, or in Thailand without Ayutthaya and Khao Yai? When UNESCO inscribes a heritage site and bestows on it global importance, it usually becomes an immediate tourist attraction and is subject to the pressures of increasing numbers of tourists and the development of the facilities and infrastructures which tourists demand. But what happens to those areas, cultures and communities which are excluded from this privileged status, on the margins of an international heritage site? Do they benefit or suffer economically, culturally and environmentally because of the arbitrary delineation of heritage boundaries? Case-studies are taken from Cambodia, Thailand and Malaysia to explore the dilemmas created by an increasing preoccupation with the internationalization of heritage.

show abstract

Section: Heritage-scapesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Heritage-scapesmentioning

confidence: 99%

World Heritage Sites and their Margins in Southeast Asian Tourism Development: Heritage-scapes or Non-heritage Spaces?

King¹

2018

AJTR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Bibliography

2018

A Companion to Public History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Participatory Collection and Dissemination of Architectural and Urban Heritage Information: P@trimonia Platform

Stiti

Jeunejean

Rajeb

2022

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New ways of accessing heritage information are emerging to promote local histories and connect communities with their heritage. In this study, a group of actors gave feedback about our newly developed platform P@trimonia to contribute information to the architectural and urban heritage for public use. The objective of the study is twofold. First, it aims to assess the role of participation and Information and communication technologies ICT platforms in promoting the heritage, the credibility of information different actors can provide, and their interest in information shared by other actors. And second, it demonstrates the technological output of the ICT platform P@trimonia itself. The methodology in the study covers focus group survey, literature reviews and analysis of the survey results. The participants in the focus group are academics, scientists, and experts. The overview of the results allows us to validate the role of participation and the importance of using ICT in promoting cultural heritage. Analysis results emphasize that the credibility provided by the actors depends on the type of information, their knowledge level, and their interest in collecting and sharing information related to architectural and urban heritage. The discussion is based on the influence of the actor participation and ICT use on the stages of patrimonialization.

show abstract

« Paysage patrimonial » ou « paysages patrimoniaux » ?

Cited by 6 publications

References 21 publications

World Heritage Sites and their Margins in Southeast Asian Tourism Development: Heritage-scapes or Non-heritage Spaces?

World Heritage Sites and their Margins in Southeast Asian Tourism Development: Heritage-scapes or Non-heritage Spaces?

Bibliography

Participatory Collection and Dissemination of Architectural and Urban Heritage Information: P@trimonia Platform

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About