Payments for Watershed Ecosystem Services in the Eyes of the Public, China

Abstract

Recent decades have witnessed an increased development of schemes for payment for watershed ecosystem services (PWES). However, the public is usually excluded from PWES systems. Reliable and empirical research on PWES from the public perspective is scarce. Aiming to understand public perceptions, attitudes, participation, and responses to PWES, this paper investigated local residents living in the Yongding River watershed area through a face-to-face questionnaire survey. The results showed that the public had limited knowledge of PWES. The public was keen to be involved in PWES decision-making, but the current level of public participation was very low. Regarding willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA), nearly 55% of the respondents supported paying the upstream residents for protecting the environment if they were beneficiaries in the downstream areas, while 85% of the respondents agreed to accept compensation if they were contributors to environmental improvement in the upstream areas. Although some of the respondents’ daily lives were affected by the watershed environment, they were reluctant to pay, reflecting a sign of “free-riding”. The regression analysis showed that public concerns, values, knowledge of PWES and the watershed environment, and demographic factors determined the WTP and WTA. The results of the contingent valuation method and opportunity costs method showed that the annual payment for headwater conservation areas (Huailai and Yanqing) ranged from CNY 245 to 718 million (USD 36 to 106 million). This study contributes to our limited knowledge and understanding of public sentiment and makes recommendations for improving public receptivity to PWES.

Diretrizes Para O Planejamento E Desenho De Esquemas De Pagamento Por Serviços Ambientais

“…A presença de esquemas de PSA-hídrico também não gera surpresa, uma vez que o setor é o mais maduro em termos de valor de transação e distribuição geográfica (i.e., US$24,7 bilhões em 62 países em 2015) (SALZMAN et al, 2018), resultando em um aumento em números desse tipo de PSA nas últimas décadas (CHEN;HE;LU, 2022). O SE água vem se destacando em estudos que analisam esquemas de PSA no mundo (e.g.…”

Watershed Horizontal Ecological Compensation Policy and Green Ecological City Development: Spatial and Mechanism Assessment

“…A higher level of internet development in a city can improve the city's digitalization process, thereby increasing the city's productivity [59]. (7) Electricity consumption (Ec), which is measured by the annual electricity consumption. Electricity consumption is an integral part of energy consumption, and energy consumption is an essential factor affecting the city's GTFP [60].…”

“…In 1982, it formally established a sewage charging system [6]. In 1994, it raised the overall strategy of sustainable development to a national strategy [7]. After that, in 2014, China revised the Environmental Protection Law again [8].…”

Ecosystem Service and Land-Use Changes in Asia: Implications for Regional Sustainability

“…Ratnayake et al [15], in their study titled "Land Use-Based Participatory Assessment of Ecosystem Services for Ecological Restoration in Village Tank Cascade Systems of Sri Lanka", applied a participatory approach involving the integration of local knowledge, expert judgements and land use systems attribute data to assess the ESs. Chen et al [16], in their study titled "Payments for Watershed Ecosystem Services in the Eyes of the Public, China", showed that the public had limited knowledge of the payment for ESs schemes. Therefore, improving public acceptance is essential for more effective payment schemes, and further research is needed on the impact of payment schemes on the public.…”