Paying people for getting vaccinated? A favorable solution for both vaccine‐hesitant persons and the public

Reese, Alexander; Pies, Ingo

doi:10.1111/bioe.13001

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Giving fines violates the dignity of citizens who are doubtful about vaccines or who refuse vaccines. Research conducted by Alexander (Reese et al, 2022) supports this argument.…”

Section: Respect For Human Dignity and Human Rightsmentioning

confidence: 87%

The Impact of Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccination Policy in Indonesia: Legal and Bioethics Perspectives

Hakiim,

Hartini

2024

UUMJLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Indonesian government has made significant efforts to provide vaccines as a solution to prevent the transmission of COVID-19. However, while some individuals have received the vaccine, others have refused due to fear and doubts about its safety and halal status. The implementation of a policy mandating COVID-19 vaccination by the government has both advantages and disadvantages. According to the policy, individuals who refuse to vaccinate will face administrative and criminal sanctions. Therefore, this research aims to provide a summary of the mandatory COVID-19 immunization policy, particularly in Indonesia, from both a legal and bioethical perspective. A legal approach and normative bioethical principles were used to analyze applicable legal norms and bioethical principles, utilizing literature research. Legal materials included Law Number 4 of 1984 concerning Outbreaks of Infectious Diseases, Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health, Article 28H of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, and Article 34 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. Meanwhile, the source of bioethical data used was the Universal Declaration of Bioethical and Human Rights. Instead of implementing a mandatory vaccination policy containing elements of criminal sanctions, the government should actively engage with the community and analyze why there are still doubts regarding COVID-19 vaccination. This would be a more effective and humane strategy for providing health protection. A mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy should be based on a comprehensive strategy and ongoing efforts, taking into account legal and bioethical aspects.

show abstract

“…Giving fines violates the dignity of citizens who are doubtful about vaccines or who refuse vaccines. Research conducted by Alexander (Reese et al, 2022) supports this argument.…”

Section: Respect For Human Dignity and Human Rightsmentioning

confidence: 87%

The Impact of Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccination Policy in Indonesia: Legal and Bioethics Perspectives

Hakiim,

Hartini

2024

UUMJLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Of course, the full range of other tools of policy development must also be used, such as cost‐benefit analysis, gender‐based analysis, and feasibility testing. For example, although offering $100 to all vaccinated Albertans was unlikely to face significant moral opposition, there are other reasons why this approach could have remained undesirable, including its cost, its ineffectiveness at increasing vaccination rates (Chang et al, 2021) and its potential to weaken social incentives to get vaccinated (Loewenstein & Cryder, 2020). These other considerations should also factor into the ultimate decision between these policy options.…”

Section: Moral Reaction Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Morality analysis: Reducing moral backlash to public policy

Mills¹

2023

Can Public Adm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Widely used policy development processes rarely systematically consider differing moral values, which can lead to overlooked risks, ineffective communications and suboptimal policy design. This article introduces morality analysis, a policy tool that draws on moral foundations theory to optimize policy and program design, build public support for policies and present key advice to decisionmakers. Morality analysis is used to examine the case of a controversial vaccination incentive program introduced by the Government of Alberta in late 2021 and identify policy options that would likely have prompted less public backlash. This article suggests that morality analysis should supplement the policy analysis toolkit. SommaireLes processus d'élaboration de politiques très souvent utilisés tiennent rarement compte des valeurs morales divergentes, ce qui entraîne la négligence des risques, des communications inefficaces et une conception des politiques sous-optimale. Cet article présente l'analyse de la moralitéun outil politique qui repose sur la théorie des fondements morauxdans le but d'optimiser la conception des politiques et des programmes, de renforcer le soutien du public aux politiques et d'offrir d'importants conseils aux décideurs. L'analyse de la moralité est utilisée

show abstract

More Time, Carrot-and-Stick, or Piling Coffins? Estimating the Role of Factors Overcoming COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Poland and Lithuania in the Years 2021–2022

Walkowiak

2022

Vaccines

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, motivation for late (from 2021-W22, i.e., 24 July 2021) uptake of the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine among adults in Poland and Lithuania is indirectly measured in order to avoid social-desirability bias or rationalisation in retrospect of prior decisions. Weekly vaccine uptake is modeled as if vaccine hesitant people were late adopters of a new product, with a fitted non-linear trend representing steadily decreasing interest. Before the analysed period, the vaccine uptake among Polish and Lithuanian adults was almost identical. Vaccination simply explainable by the trend was responsible for the vaccination of an additional 19.96% and 19.06% adults, respectively. The fear incurred by spikes in consecutive waves of infection motivated 3.20% and 3.89% more people, respectively, while the COVID-19 passport, introduced only in Lithuania, convinced an additional 13.98% of the overall population. The effect of the COVID passport was the biggest in the 18–24 age group, and the least visible among people aged 80 or more. In the latter group, other factors also had a limited impact, with merely 1.32% tempted by the one-time €100 payment offered to everybody aged 75 or more.

show abstract

Paying people for getting vaccinated? A favorable solution for both vaccine‐hesitant persons and the public

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

The Impact of Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccination Policy in Indonesia: Legal and Bioethics Perspectives

The Impact of Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccination Policy in Indonesia: Legal and Bioethics Perspectives

Morality analysis: Reducing moral backlash to public policy

More Time, Carrot-and-Stick, or Piling Coffins? Estimating the Role of Factors Overcoming COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Poland and Lithuania in the Years 2021–2022

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About