2001
DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.111576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paying for hospital emergency care under a single-payer system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two major philosophical approachesone based on throughput measurement, either per capita or adjusted for casemix, and the other based on the concept of role delineation -emergency response, institution role and availability, with only small adjustments for volume. 30 The difficulty with fee for service in EM is that it is possible to generate any number of EM visits to increase revenue. It also does not encourage patients to seek alternative services or other providers to take responsibility.…”
Section: Funding Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two major philosophical approachesone based on throughput measurement, either per capita or adjusted for casemix, and the other based on the concept of role delineation -emergency response, institution role and availability, with only small adjustments for volume. 30 The difficulty with fee for service in EM is that it is possible to generate any number of EM visits to increase revenue. It also does not encourage patients to seek alternative services or other providers to take responsibility.…”
Section: Funding Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost infrastructure of EDs contains a fixed and variable component. The fixed component represents the standby capability while the variable component is directly related to patient throughput and complexity 60. On the other hand, private hospitals are mostly funded by patient payments.…”
Section: A Conceptual Framework For Triagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, as the study authors note, general practitioners working in EDs in the United Kingdom have been shown to be more cost-efficient than junior medical staff in the same environment, the actual cost of emergency medicine is dominated by infrastructure and staff expenses 24 hours per day. 6 EDs have a high average cost per patient and a low marginal (incremental) cost for additional low-acuity presentations, especially compared with off-site after-hours clinics, where expenses are dominated by medical labour, and the average and marginal costs are much A EDIT ORIAL S closer together. Even if patients were 100% interchangeable, a new after-hours service would likely represent an increase in total cost to the community, because it would not reduce the need for the "public good" of a 24-hour service available at the hospital.…”
Section: Drew B Richardsonmentioning
confidence: 99%