Payday lending in the UK: the regul(aris)ation of a necessary evil?

Abstract

Concern about the increasing use of payday lending led the UK's Financial Conduct Authority to introduce landmark reforms in 2014/15. While these reforms have generally been welcomed as a way of curbing ‘extortionate’ and ‘predatory’ lending, this paper presents a more nuanced picture based on a theoretically-informed analysis of the growth and nature of payday lending combined with original and rigorous qualitative interviews with customers. We argue that payday lending has grown as a result of three major and inter-related trends: growing income insecurity for people both in and out of work; cuts in state welfare provision; and increasing financialisation. Recent reforms of payday lending do nothing to tackle these root causes. Our research also makes a major contribution to debates about the ‘everyday life’ of financialisation by focusing on the ‘lived experience’ of borrowers. We show that, contrary to the rather simplistic picture presented by the media and many campaigners, various aspects of payday lending are actually welcomed by customers, given the situations they are in. Tighter regulation may therefore have negative consequences for some. More generally, we argue that the regul(aris)ation of payday lending reinforces the shift in the role of the state from provider/redistributor to regulator/enabler.

Resilient communities? Experiences of risk and resilience in a time of austerity

“…However, so far there is a lack of evidence about the extent to which this resilience agenda has been taken up -or indeed noticed -by the public, or how it is shaped by the broader context of austerity. The effect of welfare cuts and state retrenchment has been to push the everyday lives of many into chronic crisis, involving routine reliance on emergency measures such as food banks (Lambie-Mumford 2013) and payday loans (Rowlingson et al 2016). At the same time, cuts to public spending and government departments have led to numerous plans and projects to manage or mitigate risks -such as flood defences -being postponed or cancelled.…”

Peering Forward, 10 Years After: International Policy and Consumer Credit Regulation

“…Caplovitz was an early proponent therefore of what later became known as "joined up policy making". In countries of the North, high cost credit is often an adjunct to the social welfare system (FCA 2019;Fleming 2018;Marston and Shevellar 2014;Rowlingson et al 2016) and the appropriate balance of consumer and social policies in this area remains contested.…”

New trends in financial inclusion policies: role of digital technologies and digital inclusion

“…Some of these problems are economy-related. For example, the research shows that poverty and insecure work, variable wages push people to use payday loans which can charge higher fees and interest than traditional financial institutions but have higher risk appetite and thus have higher loan approval rates (Rowlingson et al, 2016).…”