1996
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02171-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pavlovian conditioning of LPS-induced responses: Effects on corticosterone, splenic NE, and IL-2 production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to behavioral responses, other neural, endocrine and immune modifications might be elicited after taste-immune associations are retrieved [7,8] . The present data confirm previous reports indicating a significant reduction of the consummatory fluid intake behavior (in a single choice test), after a relevant gustatory clue has been contingently associated with the effects of peripheral LPS administration in rats [11,13,15] . Analogous behavioral conditioned responses have been elicited after pairing gustatory stimulation with peripherally administered specific cytokines [27][28][29] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to behavioral responses, other neural, endocrine and immune modifications might be elicited after taste-immune associations are retrieved [7,8] . The present data confirm previous reports indicating a significant reduction of the consummatory fluid intake behavior (in a single choice test), after a relevant gustatory clue has been contingently associated with the effects of peripheral LPS administration in rats [11,13,15] . Analogous behavioral conditioned responses have been elicited after pairing gustatory stimulation with peripherally administered specific cytokines [27][28][29] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Retrieving such taste-LPS engram results in conditioned reduced consummatory feeding behavior, and more specifically, in changes in the palatability value of the conditioned stimulus [11][12][13][14] . In addition to these behavioral conditioned responses, it has been reported that evoking a taste-LPS engram results in conditioned activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, a reduction of splenic noradrenaline content, and IL-2 production [15] , as well as changes in body temperature [9] . In contrast, the conditioned response does not activate cytokine gene expression in the spleen and hypothalamus of mice [16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental group is then re-exposed to the CS during evocation and alterations in neuroendocrine functions (e.g., concentrations of adrenaline, glucose, cortisol, insulin, norepinephrine, glucagon, vasopressin, ACTH, somatropin) 710 are analyzed, reflecting the conditioned response. Although learned placebo responses in neuroendocrine functions have been demonstrated in experimental animals (Ader, 1976;Buske-Kirschbaum et al, 1996;Janz et al, 1996;Pacheco-Lopez et al, 2004), there are few studies reporting these effects in humans, and those that do mainly employed insulin as a US measuring blood glucose or insulin levels as a conditioned response (Fehm-Wolfsdorf et al, 1993;Stockhorst et al, 1999Stockhorst et al, , 2004Stockhorst et al, , 2011Klosterhalfen et al, 2000;reviewed in Wendt et al, 2014b). Two human studies reported conditioned changes in plasma cortisol concentrations.…”
Section: E Neuroendocrine Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, these antigens induce corticosterone release [34,57 -59], considered to be part of the adaptive suppressive neuroendocrine response necessary to control immune reactivity [30]. Furthermore, both antigens have been also employed as unconditioned stimuli in associative learning protocols, inducing a conditioned taste avoidance as well as other conditioned responses; fever, sympathetic activity, glucocorticoids and cytokines among other parameters [34,48,60,61]. We further focused on the IC and Am as two structures known to be involved in immune-to-brain communication in general [42,44,62 -64], and in the behaviourally conditioned immune response in particular [45 -47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%