2018
DOI: 10.1080/08940886.2018.1435949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paving the Way to Ultra-High-Resolution Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering with the SIX Beamline at NSLS-II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RIXS measurements were performed using the Soft Inelastic X-ray (SIX) 2-ID beamline 68,69 . Varied line spacing gratings with line spacings of 500 mm −1 and 1250 mm −1 were, respectively, used on the beamline and spectrometer which, coupled with a 20 μm exit slit, provided a combined resolution of 32 meV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RIXS measurements were performed using the Soft Inelastic X-ray (SIX) 2-ID beamline 68,69 . Varied line spacing gratings with line spacings of 500 mm −1 and 1250 mm −1 were, respectively, used on the beamline and spectrometer which, coupled with a 20 μm exit slit, provided a combined resolution of 32 meV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 4 shows that the Veritas PGM has the most stringent step requirements due to its resolving power design goal of 100 000 -a figure often pursued (Jarrige et al, 2018;Huang & Chen, 2018;Song et al, 2006;Weiss et al, 2001;Follath, 2001) and denoted ultra-high resolution. For high energies, the mechanics should be able to provide steps as small as 20 nrad to make sure that it is the optics that limits the resolution.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under ideal conditions they can reach a sub-eV energy resolution in the hard and a few tens of meV in the soft X-ray range [82,88,89]. Considering the most recent developments at the SIX beamline at NSLS-II, they now reach a DE ¼ 14meV at an energy of E ¼ 1 keV, translating to a E=DE % 71500 [90]. The downside of the WDX based detection is that each (crystal) configuration covers a relatively small energy range, say a few hundred eV in the soft energy range to a few keV in the hard energy range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%