2007
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.24.000204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pauli algebraic forms of normal and nonnormal operators

Abstract: A unified treatment of the Pauli algebraic forms of the linear operators defined on a unitary linear space of two dimensions over the field of complex numbers C 1 is given. The Pauli expansions of the normal and nonnormal operators, unitary and Hermitian operators, orthogonal projectors, and symmetries are deduced in this frame. A geometrical interpretation of these Pauli algebraical results is given. With each operator, one can associate a generally complex vector, its Pauli axis. This is a natural generaliza… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diattenuators constitute a subclass of nondepolarizing systems characterized by the fact that they produce differential intensity attenuation on their two polarization eigenstates. Diattenuators whose Mueller matrix is symmetric are called normal [53][54][55][56] or homogeneous [1].…”
Section: Diattenuatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diattenuators constitute a subclass of nondepolarizing systems characterized by the fact that they produce differential intensity attenuation on their two polarization eigenstates. Diattenuators whose Mueller matrix is symmetric are called normal [53][54][55][56] or homogeneous [1].…”
Section: Diattenuatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pure Mueller matrices always satisfy D = P [32]. When m R = I 3 , then M J is usually denoted as M D and corresponds to a normal diattenuator [33,34] (or homogeneous diattenuator [35]), while D = 0 (i.e., zero diattenuation-polarizance and m = m R ) is characteristic of retarders, which are denoted as M R [30].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be understood as an operator describing a linear polarizer [15]. The contrast of intensity takes the form:…”
Section: Relation Between the Quantum Definition Of Dop And The Opticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider, for example, a beam containing only linearly polarized photons -according to (15) We can also present a formal analogy between classical and quantum theory by considering a quantum correlation function, defined by Glauber [11] as coincidence between photon detection at two points in space for two moments in time:…”
Section: Physical Interpretation Of Dop and Dopmentioning
confidence: 99%