Patton, Michael Q.: Blue Marble Evaluation. Premises and Principles

Beywl, Wolfgang

doi:10.31244/zfe.2020.02.09

Cited by 10 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The network created a set of eight initial principles, as such guiding methodology (Page et al, 2020;Page et al, 2021). They included important factors like empathy, continuous learning, and appreciation of different ways of communicating and relating, as well as understanding values as a concept (Köpfer, 2012;Rosado, 2006;Singh, 2013;Patton, 2018). They create an environment of safety where all contribute and integrate their unique skills and knowledge systems (Őnday, 2016;Köpfer, 2012;Wamsler et al, 2020).…”

Section: Principles As T-systems Guiding Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Source : Page, et al (2020, p. 5-6). Principles are designed from values, expertise, experience, and research to guide thinking and behaving (Patton, 2018). Grounded in deep ethical values, they are a tool for consistent and coherent steering of change in group governance and evaluation.…”

Section: Principles As T-systems Guiding Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Beyond only focusing on outcomes, such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals or the SMART framework, they inform a pathway of collaboration to accomplish shared goals. In networks and organizations, they create a safe environment to co-design the internal culture and vision (Op 't Land and Proper, 2007;Patton, 2018).…”

Section: Principles As T-systems Guiding Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Examples principle uses include the Earth Charter to guide planetary wellbeing, the Blue Marble Evaluation Principles as an evaluation model, the Principles for Healthy Community Building for planning and designing healthy communities, and the Digital Media Principles as marketing design principles (Earth Charter, 2020;Patton and Campbell-Patton, 2020;Reyna et al, 2018;Wolff, 2010). All to be interpreted in their context and situation for relevance and adaptivity (Patton, 2018).…”

Section: Principles As T-systems Guiding Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These values reflect the most important aspects of the T-System structure, yet are too broad and fast changing due to the unknown and invisible development of the stakeholders involved, and the limitations of linear measurements (Olsson et al, 2017;Wamsler et al, 2020). Hence, a more adaptive and principle-focused framework is needed for complex environments (Patton, 2018;Patton, 2020). Thus, this study uses the GUIDE framework, to evaluate the effective use of the TSM&A WG principles to support TOC.…”

Section: Evaluating An Emergent Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Evaluating the Effective Use of Guiding Principles for Transformative Online Collaboration in the Transformation Systems Mapping and Analysis Working Group

Braun

2021

Glocality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper explains the effective use of guiding principles to foster transformative online collaboration (TOC). TOC describes the ability of an online network to collaborate with a vision of creating and mapping planetary well-being, ecological sustainability, and social equity, in an emergent and open-hearted way. The network research is conducted in the Transformation Systems Mapping and Analysis Working Group (TSM&A WG). The study triangulation includes focus group discussions, interviews, and a social system map analysis of the network. The evaluation is done with the GUIDE framework regarding the principle's guidance, usability, inspiration, development, and evaluation. The behavior approach for TOC roots in concepts like Theory-U and Spiral Dynamics.The results show the critical importance of shared principles and their enactment for safe and open collaboration. They facilitate deeper online collaboration in the field of Transformation-Systems (T-Systems). Findings further include the future development of the members' value framework and ways to enact and integrate the principles in the network. Supported by literature, the principles are evaluated for change and modification. The paper offers a complete set of guiding principles for TOC, created after adopting new overarching and operational values. Further, the study proposes and discusses new implementation practices to enhance the members' principle embodiment for TOC.

show abstract

Section: Principles As T-systems Guiding Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Principles As T-systems Guiding Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Principles As T-systems Guiding Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Principles As T-systems Guiding Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Evaluating An Emergent Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Evaluating the Effective Use of Guiding Principles for Transformative Online Collaboration in the Transformation Systems Mapping and Analysis Working Group

Braun

2021

Glocality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Making Monitoring and Evaluation a Part of National and Organizational Culture

Persaud

Dagher

2021

The Role of Monitoring and Evaluation in the UN 2030 SDGs Agenda

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Enabling Systems Innovation in Climate Change Adaptation: Exploring the Role for MEL

Gregorowski

Bours²

2022

Transformational Change for People and the Planet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditional monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) approaches, methods, and tools no longer reflect the dynamic complexity of the severe (or “super-wicked”) problems that define the Anthropocene: climate change, environmental degradation, and global pandemics. In late 2019, the Adaptation Fund’s Technical Evaluation Reference Group (AF-TERG) commissioned a study to identify and assess innovative MEL approaches, methods, and technologies to better support and enable climate change adaptation (CCA) and to inform the Fund’s own approach to MEL. This chapter presents key findings from the study, with seven recommendations to support a systems innovation approach to CCA: Promote and lead with a CCA systems innovation approach, engaging with key concepts of complex systems, super-wicked problems, the Anthropocene, and socioecological systems. Engage better with participation, inclusivity, and voice in MEL. Overcome risk aversion in CCA and CCA MEL through field testing new, innovative, and often more risky MEL approaches. Demonstrate and promote using MEL to support and integrate adaptive management. Work across socioecological systems and scales. Advance MEL approaches to better support systematic evidence and learning for scaling and replicability. Adapt or develop MEL approaches, methods, and tools tailored to CCA systems innovation.

show abstract

Patton, Michael Q.: Blue Marble Evaluation. Premises and Principles

Cited by 10 publications

References 0 publications

Evaluating the Effective Use of Guiding Principles for Transformative Online Collaboration in the Transformation Systems Mapping and Analysis Working Group

Evaluating the Effective Use of Guiding Principles for Transformative Online Collaboration in the Transformation Systems Mapping and Analysis Working Group

Making Monitoring and Evaluation a Part of National and Organizational Culture

Enabling Systems Innovation in Climate Change Adaptation: Exploring the Role for MEL

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About