2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02437-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of treatment failure in patients with prostate cancer treated with 76–80 Gy radiotherapy to the prostate and seminal vesicles ± hormonotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although chemotherapy has been established as effective in castration-resistant prostate cancer [ 13 , 14 ], it is noteworthy that, in this case, the addition of PBT rendered additional chemotherapy unnecessary. It is known that recurrence near the apex of the prostate is common [ 15 ]. It was previously reported that 69 of 77 patients (90%) who underwent salvage radical prostatectomy and did not respond to initial RT had recurrence tumors at the apex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although chemotherapy has been established as effective in castration-resistant prostate cancer [ 13 , 14 ], it is noteworthy that, in this case, the addition of PBT rendered additional chemotherapy unnecessary. It is known that recurrence near the apex of the prostate is common [ 15 ]. It was previously reported that 69 of 77 patients (90%) who underwent salvage radical prostatectomy and did not respond to initial RT had recurrence tumors at the apex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMRT is the standard radiation modality used in the treatment of high-risk localized prostate cancer. A recent study with IMRT at a dose of 76–80 Gy plus ADT, which was administrated in 78.5% of the patients with NCCN high-risk localized prostate carcinoma, reported 5-year bDFS and metastasis-free survival rates of 80.6% and 92.5%, respectively [ 25 ]. Simizu et al (2017) have described clinical outcomes after IMRT (72.6–74.8 Gy in 2.2 Gy per fraction) plus ADT administrated to 61% of the patients with high-risk prostate carcinoma and report 5-year bDFS and clinical RFS rates of 77% and 87%, respectively [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies had confirmed that increasing the prescription dose to 78–80 Gy in conventional fraction could significantly improve BFFS and reduce PC-related mortality. 14 , 15 , 16 According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines of 2005, the prescription dose for low-risk patients should reach to 70– 75 Gy, while for patients with intermediate- and high-risk that should be up to 75–80 Gy in conventional fraction. 17 However, as the dose was further increased, the incidence of severe GU and GI toxicities would increase significantly, which limited the benefit from dose-escalation with CFRT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%