Abstract:This paper reports on research conducted to understand key factors impacting the recruitment and selection of senior academic leaders in Australian universities. A key finding emerging from this research was an increasing reliance on executive search firms when recruiting senior academic leaders. This reliance is driven by a range of factors including an ageing and contracting pool of potential academic leaders, growing competition domestically and internationally and the declining attractiveness of academia a… Show more
“…Yet, while the work and development of senior leaders at Australian universities have been studied (e.g. Loomes, Owens and McCarthy, 2018;Scott, Coates and Anderson, 2008;Scott, et al, 2010), very little is known about the nature and characteristics of these leaders. Indeed, while confidential commercial investigations may exist, scholarly research on this topic would appear to be beyond the scope of not just government policy reviews but also national platforms for leadership research and development.…”
Section: National Perspectives On Australian University Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There could be value in studying the links made in Australia between the governance by councils and the executive leadership. Building on Loomes, Owens and McCarthy (2018) and Deem (2018), there would be value in learning more about the Australian approach to progressing people from academic into leadership roles. Cultivating values which encourage the inclusion of diverse stakeholders is likely to become more important.…”
Section: Articulating Insights and Future Perspectivesmentioning
Ensuring effective university governance and leadership is more important than ever before given contemporary transformations of higher education functions, institutions and social roles. This paper reports contributions which seek to stimulate research in this field. Drawing from the formative case study of Australian universities, it discusses prevailing insights and gaps in leadership research, and articulates theoretical dimensions of good governance, an analytical framework for studying the empirical nature and work of university senior leaders, and the characteristics of contemporary arrangements. The paper contributes methodological approaches, analytical frameworks and empirical insights which are designed to generalize and replicate in broader research.
“…Yet, while the work and development of senior leaders at Australian universities have been studied (e.g. Loomes, Owens and McCarthy, 2018;Scott, Coates and Anderson, 2008;Scott, et al, 2010), very little is known about the nature and characteristics of these leaders. Indeed, while confidential commercial investigations may exist, scholarly research on this topic would appear to be beyond the scope of not just government policy reviews but also national platforms for leadership research and development.…”
Section: National Perspectives On Australian University Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There could be value in studying the links made in Australia between the governance by councils and the executive leadership. Building on Loomes, Owens and McCarthy (2018) and Deem (2018), there would be value in learning more about the Australian approach to progressing people from academic into leadership roles. Cultivating values which encourage the inclusion of diverse stakeholders is likely to become more important.…”
Section: Articulating Insights and Future Perspectivesmentioning
Ensuring effective university governance and leadership is more important than ever before given contemporary transformations of higher education functions, institutions and social roles. This paper reports contributions which seek to stimulate research in this field. Drawing from the formative case study of Australian universities, it discusses prevailing insights and gaps in leadership research, and articulates theoretical dimensions of good governance, an analytical framework for studying the empirical nature and work of university senior leaders, and the characteristics of contemporary arrangements. The paper contributes methodological approaches, analytical frameworks and empirical insights which are designed to generalize and replicate in broader research.
“…The declining nature of federal funding to Australian universities accentuates the dependence on overseas students with the Commonwealth Grant Scheme (CGS), the main source of government funding for universities, being capped at 2017 levels (Universities Australia 2020a). Universities have therefore been more pragmatic and acted like corporate entities by prioritising international markets as their key source of growth (Loomes et al 2019). With COVID-19 compromising the ability of international students to resume their studies in Australia, there are serious implications for the financial resilience of Australian universities.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
This article explores the impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) upon Australia’s education industry with a particular focus on universities. With the high dependence that the revenue structures of Australian universities have on international student tuition fees, they are particularly prone to the economic challenges presented by COVID-19. As such, this study considers the impact to total Australian university revenue and employment caused by the significant decline in the number of international students continuing their studies in Australia during the current pandemic. We use a linear regression model calculated from data published by the Australian Government’s Department of Education, Skills, and Employment (DESE) to predict the impact of COVID-19 on total Australian university revenue, the number of international student enrolments in Australian universities, and the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) positions at Australian universities. Our results have implications for both policy makers and university decision makers, who should consider the need for revenue diversification in order to reduce the risk exposure of Australian universities.
“…Active leadership is outgoing and likes to interact with people. In team building, it is often able to drive the atmosphere, increase communication between teams, increase communication opportunities between team members, and effectively increase the rationality of decision-making and the efficiency of work between teams [3]. The frequency of communication and the atmosphere of communication and the way in which it communicates have a fundamental impact on the decision-making performance of the organization.…”
Section: A Active College Education Team Leader and Team Buildingmentioning
In order to improve the leadership of the leaders of college education teams, promote cooperation between the members of the education team, and enhance the team's comprehensive strength and cohesion, this paper, based on the classification of personality in psychology and the relevant theories of leaders, explores the perfection of the leadership character of college education team by analyzing the relationship between the leadership character of college education team and team building. Finally, the perfection strategy of the leader's character is concluded, which indicates the leader himself should keep a low profile, face the weakness of the character, maintain an open mind, change the personality weakness, and put forward the characteristics of the university education leader from the perspectives of professionalism, system and subject.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.