2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of plant communities along vertical gradient in Dhauladhar Mountains in Lesser Himalayas in North-Western India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the numbers of species and OTUs were higher at low altitudes than high altitudes. The main reason may be that high-altitude organisms were more susceptible to environmental stress than low-altitude plants (Ahmad et al, 2020). In addition, the result also corresponded to the habitat hypothesis that AMF communities follow changes in abiotic conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the numbers of species and OTUs were higher at low altitudes than high altitudes. The main reason may be that high-altitude organisms were more susceptible to environmental stress than low-altitude plants (Ahmad et al, 2020). In addition, the result also corresponded to the habitat hypothesis that AMF communities follow changes in abiotic conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Besides, the highest species evenness and Shannon diversity both appeased at low altitude at 1,170 m and had a decreasing trend at mid-altitude. The reasons for this result may be that compared with high altitude and low altitude, the plant's species replacement rate was less at mid-altitude (Ahmad et al, 2020). At the same time, they are also likely affected by large-scale climate and environment forcing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results of this study can provide information about inter-species relations and plant responses to environmental stresses (Omelko et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2020). Different spatial structures were also linked to different ecological functions, such as biodiversity (Ahmad et al, 2020;Chi et al, 2019), water yield (Liu et al, 2018), productivity (Wang et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2020), and micro-scale atmosphere conditions (Abdi et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2016). Traditional quantitative ecology has utilized the two-dimensional (usually on the horizontal direction) coordination of individuals to parameterize the structure (Omelko et al, 2018); however, in this current study, the researchers opted to use a three-dimensional parameter, Structure Complexity Index (SCI), based on the coordination and heights of individuals.…”
Section: Ecological Functions Of Population Spatial Structuresmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The results of this study can provide information about inter‐species relations and plant responses to environmental stresses (Omelko et al, 2018; Xu et al, 2020). Different spatial structures were also linked to different ecological functions, such as biodiversity (Ahmad et al, 2020; Chi, Sun, Fu, & Xie, 2019), water yield (Liu et al, 2018), productivity (Wang et al, 2019; Wang et al, 2020), and micro‐scale atmosphere conditions (Abdi, Hami, & Zarehaghi, 2020; Liu et al, 2016). Traditional quantitative ecology has utilized the two‐dimensional (usually on the horizontal direction) coordination of individuals to parameterize the structure (Omelko et al, 2018); however, in this current study, the researchers opted to use a three‐dimensional parameter, structure complexity index (SCI), based on the coordination and heights of individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%