Patterns of Orofacial Clefting in New York City From 1983 to 2010

Butts, Sydney C.; Reynolds, Simone; Gitman, Lyuba; Patel, Prayag; Joseph, Michael A.

doi:10.1177/1055665618770192

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 34 publications

(57 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It could be explained by underregistration, internal migration phenomenon, or due to low association of CL/P with ethnical groups. 31 Bogotá and its surroundings are in the center of the country and show a particular pattern compared to other regions of the country. Bogotá has the highest concentration of the CL/P population.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Population Prevalence and Trends of Oral Clefts in Colombia: Analysis by Departments

Reina

Brigetty

Salomón

2022

The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Determine the population prevalence and trends of cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) by department for Colombia in the period 2009 to 2015. Prevalence study based on Individual Registry of Health Services in general population from 2009 to 2015. All people diagnosed with CL/P were included for all ages, type of diagnosis, and any type of health services in the mentioned period. The prevalence was calculated by period and point for each year, for each department and according to the type of cleft. Stationarity on time series was evaluated using (Dickey-Fuller) and (Phillips-Perron). A trend test was applied to estimate whether the increase in prevalence was significant in the period. The trend test used was a Poisson regression. A total 15 225 people with CL/P were identified, where 53.3% were men. The national period prevalence of CL/P is 3.37 per 10 000 with upward trend (prevalence ratio = 1.34, P = .05) and nonstationary behavior. The national period prevalence of cleft lip is 0.93 per 10 000, cleft palate 1.17 per 10 000, and cleft lip and palate (CLP) 1.26 per 10 000, where CLP is subclassify into unilateral CLP (0.83 per 10 000) and bilateral CLP (0.43 per 10 000). At the departmental level, the highest CL/P prevalence is Guaviare (11.2), followed by Guainía (8.4) and the lowest Quindío (0.49). In Colombia, the national period prevalence of CL/P is 3.37 per 10 000 with upward trend at national level indicates an increase in prevalence from 2009 to 2015. The 77% of the total CL/P population are infant or adolescent. Geographically, the central region has the highest availability of technologies.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It could be explained by under-registration, internal migration phenomenon, or due to low association of CL/P with ethnical groups. 31…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Population Prevalence and Trends of Oral Clefts in Colombia: Analysis by Departments

Reina

Brigetty

Salomón

2022

The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hence, the two clefts are embryologically the same. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 Clinically, several cases of cleft lip without cleft alveolus have been reported, but no case of complete cleft alveolus without cleft lip, even microform cleft lip, has been reported. Nagase et al showed 102 patterns of cleft lip and/or cleft palate in Japanese patients using 17 classification codes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cleft lip and/or cleft palate are frequently occurring external anomalies and have shown higher incidence rates in the Japanese population than that in other ethnic groups. 1 , 2 , 3 Embryologically, incomplete fusion of the facial prominences; specifically, incomplete fusion of the frontonasal and maxillary prominences could lead to cleft lip and/or cleft alveolus. 4 , 5 A complete cleft lip is caused by a complete failure of fusion between the frontonasal and maxillary prominences, whereas incomplete fusion in some areas can result in an incomplete cleft lip.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mini‐microform cleft lip with complete cleft alveolus and palate: A case report

Fujiwara

Yoshida

Nakamichi

et al. 2021

Congenital Anomalies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cleft lip and cleft alveolus are caused by incomplete fusion of the frontonasal and maxillary prominences. However, milder forms of cleft lip are rarely accompanied by cleft alveolus. Here, we report a rare case of mini-microform cleft lip with complete cleft alveolus and cleft palate. No findings suggestive of cleft lip were evident on initial examination. However, three-dimensional facial measurements confirmed the presence of cleft lip despite no evidence of orbicularis oris muscle (OOM) rupture on ultrasonography. Collapsed nostril, as observed in this case, is usually associated with OOM rupture. However, it can also be caused by skeletal abnormalities, such as cleft alveolus. Three-dimensional facial measurements and ultrasonography can assist in accurate diagnosis when visual examination is ambiguous.

show abstract

“…North America range from 0.54 to 1.62 per 1000 and probably represent diverse racial groups. 2,22 A 10-year study on 3804 cleft patients in California, United States, found the highest incidence in Native Americans and lowest in African Americans. Whites, Japanese, and Chinese were of intermediate incidence with no significant differences between them.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Epidemiology of Clefts in Kwazulu Natal: Comparison With Systematic Review Analysis, Similarities, and Differences

Madaree

2022

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Preamble: The incidence and accuracy of cleft epidemiology is variable depending on geographical region, population group, and country being assessed. Confounding factors are rendered more accurate if consecutive patients seen in a unit over a prolonged period are reported. Materials and Methods: Plastic surgery charts at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital (IALCH) were reviewed from 2003 to 2019. Appropriate International Classification of Diseases (ICD) cleft codes were used to obtain a cleft database of all cleft patients. The review revealed 1487 cleft patients. Data extracted included sex, race, extent of cleft lip or palate, laterality, and birth month. Results: Overall, there was an almost equivalent sex distribution with 745 females and 742 males. There were 390 cleft lip only (26%), 505 cleft lip with palate (CLP) (34%), and 592 cleft palate only (40%). In the cleft lip only group, Black females were affected in 54% and males in 46%, whereas in the Asian group, females were affected in 33% and males in 67% (P=0.022). In the CLP group, Asian and Colored females were affected more (56% and 60%, respectively), while in the Black and White groups, females were less affected (40% and 26%, respectively). Cleft palate only was the most common category in Black (44%) and Colored (55%), while the CLP category was most common in Asian (49%) and White (42%). Conclusions: Demographics of cleft lip and palate in KwaZulu Natal is different from other series in certain aspects. In addition, there are differences in the race groups when analyzing certain aspects. The differences may be based on genetic or environmental factors and warrants further investigation.

show abstract

Patterns of Orofacial Clefting in New York City From 1983 to 2010

Cited by 8 publications

References 34 publications

Population Prevalence and Trends of Oral Clefts in Colombia: Analysis by Departments

Population Prevalence and Trends of Oral Clefts in Colombia: Analysis by Departments

Mini‐microform cleft lip with complete cleft alveolus and palate: A case report

Epidemiology of Clefts in Kwazulu Natal: Comparison With Systematic Review Analysis, Similarities, and Differences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About