2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-3-00515.x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of fusimotor activity during locomotion in the decerebrate cat deduced from recordings from hindlimb muscle spindles

Abstract: The part played by muscle spindles in the control of natural movements must depend on how the static and dynamic gamma (ãs and ãd) fusimotor systems are activated. However, their patterns of activity have been difficult to elucidate, because technical problems severely limit the possibilities for directly recording from ã_motoneurones. The alternative approach of deducing ã-patterns from spindle afferent records has been used in a variety of reduced preparations Journal of Physiology (2000), 522.3, pp. 515-532… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This idea has been supported by others suggesting that CNS reorganizes its neuronal connections following lesions (Carr et al 1993) by developing new connections including sprouting and strengthening of existing connections to optimize its performance (Carr et al 1993). Another possible mechanism is increased stretch-evoked synaptic excitation of motoneurons that can arise from ␥-motoneuron hyperactivity that increases muscle spindle sensitivity (Prochazka 1989;Taylor et al 2000) and an increase in sensitivity of excitatory interneurons to muscle afferents. This high sensitivity could arise from increased afferent terminal sprouting, increased postsynaptic receptor hypersensitivity, and reduced presynaptic inhibition (Burke and Ashby 1972;Burke and Lance 1973;Burke et al 1971;Iles and Roberts 1986;Katz and Rymer 1989;Stein et al 1995;Young and Shahani 1980).…”
Section: Abnormalities In Neuromuscular Properties Of Spastic Extremimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea has been supported by others suggesting that CNS reorganizes its neuronal connections following lesions (Carr et al 1993) by developing new connections including sprouting and strengthening of existing connections to optimize its performance (Carr et al 1993). Another possible mechanism is increased stretch-evoked synaptic excitation of motoneurons that can arise from ␥-motoneuron hyperactivity that increases muscle spindle sensitivity (Prochazka 1989;Taylor et al 2000) and an increase in sensitivity of excitatory interneurons to muscle afferents. This high sensitivity could arise from increased afferent terminal sprouting, increased postsynaptic receptor hypersensitivity, and reduced presynaptic inhibition (Burke and Ashby 1972;Burke and Lance 1973;Burke et al 1971;Iles and Roberts 1986;Katz and Rymer 1989;Stein et al 1995;Young and Shahani 1980).…”
Section: Abnormalities In Neuromuscular Properties Of Spastic Extremimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afferents carrying length information from muscle spindles project mainly to parent motoneurons and close synergists and are thought to contribute to the regulation of muscular stiffness (Nichols and Houk 1976) and enhanced force output during stance (Mazzaro et al 2005(Mazzaro et al , 2006Stein et al 2000). Additionally, length feedback is subject to modulation during the step cycle (Ellaway et al 2002;Sinkjaer et al 1996;Taylor et al 2000) at the stance-swing transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features with a long time course did prove to be related to stretch of the muscle. Recording the movement at the ankle and applying the same movement passively during suppression of fusimotor activity with barbiturate anaesthesia confirmed this (Taylor et al 2000a). The broad peak or oscillation in the correlogram persisted whereas the brief peak that we have associated with chain fibre activation was abolished.…”
Section: Other Sources Of Afferent Synchronymentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This implies that g S -efferents were active before locomotion commenced which is supported by direct recordings (Murphy et al 1984;Taylor et al 2000b). It would also suggest that rate modulation rather than recruitment of g S -efferents might be the basis for the wind-up in spindle discharge rates that has repeatedly been observed prior to the start of locomotion (Prochazka et al 1976;Taylor et al 2000a). For the MG muscle during locomotion, synchrony was equally evident during ankle flexion and extension.…”
Section: Expected Versus Observed Afferent Synchronymentioning
confidence: 95%