1984
DOI: 10.1086/284213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Fruit Maturation: A Gametophyte Competition Hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fruit maturation in many plant species has been pointed out as a pollinator limitation which reflects the shortage of pollinators or the lack of successful pollination (Schemske 1981, Bertin 1982, Aker 1982, Waser 1983. It has been also regarded as result of sexual selection in which male genetic success is limited by its ability to reach the ovules, while female fitness is limited by the availability of resources for the egg (Janzen 1977, Willson 1979, Stenphenson & Bertin 1983, the ultimate cause of fruit abortion (Janzen 1977, Stephenson 1981, Stephenson et al 1985, Lee 1984. The production of surplus of flowers and the massive abscission as here documented in Tabebuia, suggest that the plants might have some control over their offsprings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Fruit maturation in many plant species has been pointed out as a pollinator limitation which reflects the shortage of pollinators or the lack of successful pollination (Schemske 1981, Bertin 1982, Aker 1982, Waser 1983. It has been also regarded as result of sexual selection in which male genetic success is limited by its ability to reach the ovules, while female fitness is limited by the availability of resources for the egg (Janzen 1977, Willson 1979, Stenphenson & Bertin 1983, the ultimate cause of fruit abortion (Janzen 1977, Stephenson 1981, Stephenson et al 1985, Lee 1984. The production of surplus of flowers and the massive abscission as here documented in Tabebuia, suggest that the plants might have some control over their offsprings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…1). Resource-limited fruit set can allow plants to selectively abort immature fruit containing low quality or low quantity of seeds (Stephenson 1981;Lee 1984;Stephenson and Winsor 1986;Becerra and Lloyd 1992;Pellmyr and Huth 1994;Huth and Pellmyr 1997). Aborting fruit is a mechanism by which plants can match fruit production to available resources under a variety of resource levels (Stephenson 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function of fruit abortion in wind pollinated dioecious perennials that have small green pericarps, such as aspen, is not clear unless there is a disadvantage in wind seed dispersal associated with fruits with low numbers of seeds. Anotber bypothesis to explain the evolution of fruit abortion in this species is that small seed numbers result trom few viable pollen grains and low gametic competition, and therefore the seeds are likely to be of reduced quality (Stepbenson, 1981 ;Lee, 1984). However, in wind pollinated plants the degree of gamete competition is dependent on the number of grains that first arrive together on the receptive stigma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%