2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.06.097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of femoropopliteal recurrence after routine and selective stenting endoluminal therapy

Abstract: Objective To determine the incidence and characteristics of recurrent disease after femoropopliteal angioplasty, following either selective or routine stenting of diseased site(s). Methods Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database for femoropopliteal interventions from 6/03 to 7/10 was performed. Interventions during this period were from a single institution, followed at 1, 3 and 6 months after initial intervention and on a semiannual basis thereafter with clinical examination and duplex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,8,12 However, in a significant proportion of FP DCB interventions, a vascular scaffold placement may be necessary to treat vessel recoil, significant dissection, or otherwise suboptimal angioplasty. [12][13][14] However, little is known about the differences in procedural and long-term outcomes between stented and non-stented FP lesions treated with DCB. Our aim in this study was to examine the prevalence of adjunctive stent use during DCB angioplasty, and to report any differences in outcomes based on this procedural approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8,12 However, in a significant proportion of FP DCB interventions, a vascular scaffold placement may be necessary to treat vessel recoil, significant dissection, or otherwise suboptimal angioplasty. [12][13][14] However, little is known about the differences in procedural and long-term outcomes between stented and non-stented FP lesions treated with DCB. Our aim in this study was to examine the prevalence of adjunctive stent use during DCB angioplasty, and to report any differences in outcomes based on this procedural approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, all calculated runoff scores in the present study were target lesion based. Studies have reported occlusive lesions without good runoffs as negative predictors of lesion recanalization (1516), possibly since distal runoffs often indicate shorter lesions, less atherosclerosis, or less calcification of the diseased arterial wall, and can determine the course of the occlusive segment during intraluminal or subintimal angioplasty to reduce arterial perforation. Distal runoff may also increase the chances of the guidewire re-entering the true lumen during subintimal recanalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported that occlusive lesions without good runoff were negative predictors of patency. 19,20 A possible reason for this is that good distal runoff often indicates shorter lesions, less atherosclerosis or calcification of the diseased arterial wall. Moreover, good runoff can help determine the course of the occlusive segment during intraluminal angioplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%