Abstract:Scientific reasoning refers to the thinking skills involved in conceiving and conducting an investigation. This study examined how proficiency in performing these skills develops during the upper-elementary school years. A sample of 157 children (age 7-10) took a performancebased scientific reasoning test in three consecutive years. Four distinct developmental patterns emerged from their annual test scores, which were independent of prior domain knowledge and sociodemographic characteristics except gender. Dev… Show more
“…This study found that scientific reasoning developed overall linearly, with significant developmental progression between all grades of elementary school and no large clusters of children with nonlinear development. In line with previous longitudinal work in 8-to 10-year-olds (Lazonder et al, 2020), there was a group of children with nonlinearly developing scientificreasoning abilities (Cluster 1), who can be described as "late bloomers." These children revealed no progress in scientific reasoning between K1 and G1, but a steep increase between G1 and G3.…”
Section: Development Of Scientific Reasoningsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…One of the few longitudinal studies that addresses scientific reasoning in late elementary school (involving children aged 8-10 years) found four distinct developmental patterns: high and low achievers, and early and late bloomers. These patterns were independent of domain knowledge, math abilities, and the parental education level, and only weakly correlated with the developmental patterns for reading abilities (Lazonder et al, 2020), making it impossible to predict which children would be high or low achiever, or early or late bloomers. Research is needed to identify the beneficial and necessary starting conditions influencing the onset of the development of scientific reasoning.…”
Section: Scientific Reasoning: Early Abilities General Cognitive Abil...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Based on cross-sectional findings showing robust associations between general cognitive abilities, parental education level, and individual differences in scientific reasoning (e.g., Koerber, Mayer, et al, 2015), and longitudinal findings of no clear links between academic achievement and developmental trajectories of scientific reasoning (Lazonder et al, 2020), we expected that child and family variables would significantly affect individual differences but not the development of scientific reasoning. Based on cross-sectional findings that there are almost no children with mature scientific-reasoning abilities but no rToM (Osterhaus et al, 2017), we expected that rToM would predict subsequent scientific-reasoning abilities in early elementary school.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Lazonder et al (2020), we started with a two-cluster solution and increased the number of clusters until no additional patterns with a case frequency > 1 emerged. This analysis revealed 7 clusters (Figure 4).…”
Section: Core Ability and Development Of Scientific Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex associations between scientific reasoning and advanced theory of mind Scientific reasoning is a key 21 st -century skill (e.g., Trilling & Fadel, 2009), and its emergence in elementary school has been widely researched (see e.g., Zimmerman, 2007). Most developmental research on scientific reasoning is cross-sectional, and few longitudinal studies have been conducted in middle childhood (however, see Lazonder et al, 2020), resulting in large knowledge gaps regarding the specific mechanisms that underlie the development of early scientific reasoning. This paper reports on a six-wave longitudinal study of the effects of general cognitive abilities and mindreading skills on the development of scientific reasoning in children aged 5-10 years.…”
This 6-wave longitudinal study of 161 German 5- to 10-year-olds (89 females, 72 males) found that scientific-reasoning abilities first develop at 6 years, with significant progression between all waves. Abilities were highly stable, with the kindergarten score predicting 25% of end-of- elementary-school variance. Individual but not developmental differences were related to language abilities (.39), mindreading skills (.33), and the parental education level (.36). In early elementary school, basic mindreading skills predicted scientific reasoning (.15), but not vice versa; in late elementary school, bidirectional associations emerged between scientific-reasoning and more- complex mindreading (.11-.33). Our findings suggest that mindreading is a precursor for the development of scientific reasoning, and that older children use scientific reasoning to test and revise their advanced theories of mind.
“…This study found that scientific reasoning developed overall linearly, with significant developmental progression between all grades of elementary school and no large clusters of children with nonlinear development. In line with previous longitudinal work in 8-to 10-year-olds (Lazonder et al, 2020), there was a group of children with nonlinearly developing scientificreasoning abilities (Cluster 1), who can be described as "late bloomers." These children revealed no progress in scientific reasoning between K1 and G1, but a steep increase between G1 and G3.…”
Section: Development Of Scientific Reasoningsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…One of the few longitudinal studies that addresses scientific reasoning in late elementary school (involving children aged 8-10 years) found four distinct developmental patterns: high and low achievers, and early and late bloomers. These patterns were independent of domain knowledge, math abilities, and the parental education level, and only weakly correlated with the developmental patterns for reading abilities (Lazonder et al, 2020), making it impossible to predict which children would be high or low achiever, or early or late bloomers. Research is needed to identify the beneficial and necessary starting conditions influencing the onset of the development of scientific reasoning.…”
Section: Scientific Reasoning: Early Abilities General Cognitive Abil...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Based on cross-sectional findings showing robust associations between general cognitive abilities, parental education level, and individual differences in scientific reasoning (e.g., Koerber, Mayer, et al, 2015), and longitudinal findings of no clear links between academic achievement and developmental trajectories of scientific reasoning (Lazonder et al, 2020), we expected that child and family variables would significantly affect individual differences but not the development of scientific reasoning. Based on cross-sectional findings that there are almost no children with mature scientific-reasoning abilities but no rToM (Osterhaus et al, 2017), we expected that rToM would predict subsequent scientific-reasoning abilities in early elementary school.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Lazonder et al (2020), we started with a two-cluster solution and increased the number of clusters until no additional patterns with a case frequency > 1 emerged. This analysis revealed 7 clusters (Figure 4).…”
Section: Core Ability and Development Of Scientific Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex associations between scientific reasoning and advanced theory of mind Scientific reasoning is a key 21 st -century skill (e.g., Trilling & Fadel, 2009), and its emergence in elementary school has been widely researched (see e.g., Zimmerman, 2007). Most developmental research on scientific reasoning is cross-sectional, and few longitudinal studies have been conducted in middle childhood (however, see Lazonder et al, 2020), resulting in large knowledge gaps regarding the specific mechanisms that underlie the development of early scientific reasoning. This paper reports on a six-wave longitudinal study of the effects of general cognitive abilities and mindreading skills on the development of scientific reasoning in children aged 5-10 years.…”
This 6-wave longitudinal study of 161 German 5- to 10-year-olds (89 females, 72 males) found that scientific-reasoning abilities first develop at 6 years, with significant progression between all waves. Abilities were highly stable, with the kindergarten score predicting 25% of end-of- elementary-school variance. Individual but not developmental differences were related to language abilities (.39), mindreading skills (.33), and the parental education level (.36). In early elementary school, basic mindreading skills predicted scientific reasoning (.15), but not vice versa; in late elementary school, bidirectional associations emerged between scientific-reasoning and more- complex mindreading (.11-.33). Our findings suggest that mindreading is a precursor for the development of scientific reasoning, and that older children use scientific reasoning to test and revise their advanced theories of mind.
Scientific reasoning is a twenty-first century skill that is important for economic growth and social prosperity. A growing body of research documents that basic scientific reasoning skills develop much earlier than initially assumed, with many young elementary school and even kindergarten-aged children showing emergent scientific reasoning skills. Many studies on early scientific reasoning have been conducted in Western countries, and there is a lack of validated instruments that can be used in cross-cultural work. The present paper reports on the findings of a study assessing the psychometric properties of the shortened Chinese version of the Science-K(indergarten) Inventory (SC-SKI). The SC-SKI consists of 10 items that assess children’s understanding of the nature of science, as well as their experimentation and data interpretation skills. Sixty-nine 6- to 7-year-olds from urban and rural schools in the Hunan province (China) participated in the study. The results showed an acceptable reliability of the SC-SKI (McDonald’s ωt = 0.60). The ability estimates obtained for children’s scientific reasoning (average performance was 47.5% correct) were comparable to those measured in German 6-year-olds (45.1% correct), and the urban sample outperformed the rural sample, supporting the ability of the SC-SKI to detect expected performance differences in young children’s scientific reasoning. A significant correlation between scientific reasoning and language skills (r = 0.54, p < 0.05) confirms earlier findings and indicates construct validity. Taken together, the present study shows that the SC-SKI is a reliable and valid instrument that can be used to measure scientific reasoning in Chinese-speaking 6- to 7-year-olds.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.