2015
DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20141228-01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Communication in High-Fidelity Simulation

Abstract: High-fidelity simulation is commonplace in nursing education. However, critical thinking, decision making, and psychomotor skills scenarios are emphasized. Scenarios involving communication occur in interprofessional or intraprofessional settings. The importance of effective nurse-patient communication is reflected in statements from the American Nurses Association and Quality and Safety Education for Nurses, and in the graduate outcomes of most nursing programs. This qualitative study examined the patterns of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, HFS heightened the students’ awareness of the importance of presence and therapeutic communication with patients, through recognizing their strength or limitation in their interactions with the simulated patient. That some students may focus on tasks in HFS and miss opportunities to engage with the client in a therapeutic manner has been reported in other research, as well (Anderson & Nelson, 2014). Because nursing is a relational practice, it is important that simulation exercises be grounded in extant nursing theory that emphasizes being with the patient in true relational presence, such that artful nursing underpins technical competency (Dunnington, 2014; Eggenberger et al., 2010; Limoges, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In this study, HFS heightened the students’ awareness of the importance of presence and therapeutic communication with patients, through recognizing their strength or limitation in their interactions with the simulated patient. That some students may focus on tasks in HFS and miss opportunities to engage with the client in a therapeutic manner has been reported in other research, as well (Anderson & Nelson, 2014). Because nursing is a relational practice, it is important that simulation exercises be grounded in extant nursing theory that emphasizes being with the patient in true relational presence, such that artful nursing underpins technical competency (Dunnington, 2014; Eggenberger et al., 2010; Limoges, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, when comparing a group participating in simulation activities to a control group not participating in simulation activities, there were no significant differences in critical thinking, delegation or communication skills in a study [37]. Moreover, simulation activities could cause the feelings of discomfort [26] and of anxiety or intimidation [23], which in turn might influence learning. Both student and faculty perspectives regarding simulation have been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The experience of participating in simulation addressed the diverse learning requirements of nursing students and facilitated their learning. The outcomes of studies indicated that the use of high fidelity simulation enhanced critical thinking skills [22], competence in clinical reasoning, leadership skills, decision-making, problem-solving and prioritization abilities [5,14,23,24], motivation to learn [1,23,25]; being therapeutic [26]; and means to address quality improvement issues [27]. Although the confidence level among students participating in the high fidelity simulation method was not found to significantly differ from those students receiving the traditional lecture approach in studies [12,28], results of other studies reported that simulations helped students gain more confidence [29,11,30], and nursing students participating in human patient simulation felt that their confidence in technical skills improved [31,23,25,30].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to traditional methods, high fidelity teaching scenarios have demonstrated a measurable improvement in clinical judgment, self-confidence, skills acquisition, and communication skills. [5] Additionally engagement in affective education opportunities has been demonstrated to promote positive behaviours in students such as empathy, self-confidence, teamwork and integrity. [6] All students reported increased levels of confidence in performing MSA's following the 3-day workshop, with one exception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%