1985
DOI: 10.1080/00472338580000211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of capital accumulation and state-society relations in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This does not mean, however, that this democratic state form was a voluntaristic choice by the military. It was rather conditioned by class dynamics, especially in the post-1945 period (Yalman, 2009, 212; see also Gulalp, 1985;Kocak, 2008). 8 The prevalent accumulation strategy was based on import substituting industrialization between 1960 and 1980, and on reproduction of Turkish dependence on foreign capital.…”
Section: Private Security As a Strategy Against Labor Militancymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This does not mean, however, that this democratic state form was a voluntaristic choice by the military. It was rather conditioned by class dynamics, especially in the post-1945 period (Yalman, 2009, 212; see also Gulalp, 1985;Kocak, 2008). 8 The prevalent accumulation strategy was based on import substituting industrialization between 1960 and 1980, and on reproduction of Turkish dependence on foreign capital.…”
Section: Private Security As a Strategy Against Labor Militancymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…8 The prevalent accumulation strategy was based on import substituting industrialization between 1960 and 1980, and on reproduction of Turkish dependence on foreign capital. This strategy reached its limits mainly because of the crisis of the Bretton Woods system in the early 1970s (Gulalp, 1985). However, the manner of its actual materialization was determined by contested class relations throughout the 1970s.…”
Section: Private Security As a Strategy Against Labor Militancymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The period from 1950 to 1980 was characterized by ''an indecisive liberalization of the economy'' (Tugal 2009, p. 26) that failed to create a context of economic and political trust and stability. Outbursts of sociopolitical turmoil and economic hardship typified the period, with the Turkish military interfering with the parliamentary system three times, in 1960, 1971, and 1980. The import-substituting industrialization model characterized the Turkish development strategy in the 1960s and 1970s (Gulalp 1985). Import licenses for raw materials and investment goods were given to business elites and soon new manufacturing giants emerged (Karadag 2010).…”
Section: Transformation Of the Turkish Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rise of the militant working class movement, coupled with the crisis in the prevalent regime of accumulation, led to a crisis of the state by the second half of the 1970s (Gülalp 1985;Ozan 2012;Yalman 2002;. The state crisis, as Simon Clarke suggests (1992, p. 148), was grounded in the fact that "the working class challenge to the power of capital extends to a presented for the first time in Turkey the historical possibility of a popular democratic state form by basically recognizing labour as the constitutive socio-political force in the country.…”
Section: Chapter VI Radical Politics On the Margin Cathartic Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This does not mean, however, that such a democratic form of state was the product of a voluntarist role played by the military. It was rather conditioned in the context of the development of class dynamics especially in the post-1945 history of Turkey (Yalman 2002, p. 34;2009, p. 212; see also Gülalp 1985;Koçak 2008;Savran 2002).…”
Section: Chapter VI Radical Politics On the Margin Cathartic Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%