PsycTESTS Dataset 1998
DOI: 10.1037/t19870-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

38
1,256
2
64

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 787 publications
(1,405 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
38
1,256
2
64
Order By: Relevance
“…Achievement goal orientations were assessed during the pretest phase with the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey (PALS; Midgley et al, 2000), which was adapted to assess students' motivation in relation to science. Students were asked to report on the extent to which each item reflected their beliefs in relation to their high school biology course by rating each item on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all true, 5 = very true).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achievement goal orientations were assessed during the pretest phase with the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey (PALS; Midgley et al, 2000), which was adapted to assess students' motivation in relation to science. Students were asked to report on the extent to which each item reflected their beliefs in relation to their high school biology course by rating each item on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all true, 5 = very true).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith et al (2002) compared the PALS with two other measures of goal orientation. They developed a 16 item version based on the questionnaire developed by Midgley et al (1998) and concluded that the three goal orientation instruments were valid.…”
Section: Student Characteristics Goal Orientation Measure: Palsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PALS (Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey) scale is a widely used and validated questionnaire (Day, Radosevich & Chasteen, 2003;Midgley et al, 1998;Ross, Shannon, Salisbury-Glennon & Guarino, 2002;Smith, Duda, Allen & Hall, 2002). Smith et al (2002) compared the PALS with two other measures of goal orientation.…”
Section: Student Characteristics Goal Orientation Measure: Palsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore perceived changes in the most maladaptive classroom goal structure seem to have the most influence on the development of students' social goals. Our findings of the role of goal structures on students' own social goals builds upon the important work conducted by Shim et al (2013), and adds to the literature in several ways: a) we examined three types of classroom goals (e.g., Midgley et al, 2000) rather than two, b) we focused on high school students rather than middle school students, and c) we expanded empirical support for goal structures through examining how goal structures (and changes in goal structures) predicted trajectories of social goals rather than just mean levels. Our results suggest that classrooms should emphasize academic mastery goals and de-emphasize performance-avoidance goals (see Meece, Anderman, & Anderman, 2006 for recommendations) to encourage the development of adaptive social goals.…”
Section: The Role Of the School Contextmentioning
confidence: 64%