2007
DOI: 10.15447/sfews.2007v5iss5art1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns in the Use of a Restored California Floodplain by Native and Alien Fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, there was no difference between floodplain and river in densities of zooplankton, likely because of the low residence time of the water. Similar food web benefits have been documented in the Cosumnes River floodplain, including high phytoplankton, invertebrate, and fish productivity within the floodplain, and biomass exports to adjacent habitats (Ahearn et al 2006;Grosholz and Gallo 2006;Moyle et al 2007;Jeffres et al 2008). …”
Section: Floodplainsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, there was no difference between floodplain and river in densities of zooplankton, likely because of the low residence time of the water. Similar food web benefits have been documented in the Cosumnes River floodplain, including high phytoplankton, invertebrate, and fish productivity within the floodplain, and biomass exports to adjacent habitats (Ahearn et al 2006;Grosholz and Gallo 2006;Moyle et al 2007;Jeffres et al 2008). …”
Section: Floodplainsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This region also receives a seasonal floodplain subsidy from the Cosumnes River restored flood plain. Studies have shown that the Cosumnes River flood plain can provide important spawning and rearing habitat and food web resources for native fishes (Ahearn et al 2006;Grosholz and Gallo 2006;Moyle et al 2007;Jeffres et al 2008); however, the degree to which this production is transported into the tidal Delta has not been explored. Later, we further address his general topic of floodplain transport to the freshwater Delta (see "North Delta").…”
Section: South-central Deltamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increased connectivity, floodplain maintenance floods occur relatively frequently, with flows with a recurrence interval of one to two years capable of inducing heterogenous topography on the floodplain (Florsheim and Mount, 2002). In addition to promoting geomorphic processes and riparian regeneration, the restored connectivity allows floodplain activation floods to occur, with the associated key processes of splittail spawning, juvenile Chinook rearing (Figure 1), and food-web productivity (Figure 4b) Moyle et al, 2007). Williams et al (2009) recently explored the effect of altered flow regimes on the functionality of floodplains along the Sacramento River.…”
Section: Spawning and Rearing Habitat For Nativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last three decades, process-based restoration involving levee breaching has reconnected some of the floodplain to the river in the lower reaches, including the site used in this study. Associated scientific research and monitoring has linked this increased hydrologic connectivity to sediment deposition, increases in topographic complexity, hydrochorus dispersal of native seeds within the floodplain, riparian forest establishment and succession, primary and secondary productivity, and greater provision of spawning and rearing habitat for native fish, including juvenile Chinook salmon and the endemic minnow, Sacramento splittail (Ahearn et al, 2006;Andrews, 1999;Florsheim & Mount, 2002;Jeffres et al, 2008;Moyle, Crain, & Whitener, 2007;Swenson, Whitener, & Eaton, 2003;Trowbridge, 2002).…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%