Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1753196.1753203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns for data and metadata evolution in adaptive object-models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These patterns were mined from existing literature and tools, and sometimes driven by the development of the plugin itself. The catalog already includes patterns of maintaining the consistency of documentation artifacts [3], the classification and indexing of contents [1], the evolution of data and meta-data in systems using the Adaptive Object-Model architectural pattern [4], and of object-oriented meta-architectures [5].…”
Section: Contributions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patterns were mined from existing literature and tools, and sometimes driven by the development of the plugin itself. The catalog already includes patterns of maintaining the consistency of documentation artifacts [3], the classification and indexing of contents [1], the evolution of data and meta-data in systems using the Adaptive Object-Model architectural pattern [4], and of object-oriented meta-architectures [5].…”
Section: Contributions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WOSL is based on the Object Role Modeling language (Halpin, ), which is also used as a base for the specification of the anatomy of Archimate (Lankhorst et al , ), a similar effort to ours. In Ferreira et al (), a relation between AOM pattern and the MOF standard is presented, where run‐time instances of the operational level are equivalent to MOF's M0 and knowledge level; classes, attributes, relations and behaviour are equivalent to M1, with M2 being an equivalent to the models used to define an AOM. As in the work of Ferreira et al (), in our UEAOM all these MOF levels are projected as run‐time instances.…”
Section: The Universal Enterprise Adaptive Object Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WOSL is based in Object Role Modeling language (Halpin, 1998) which is also used as a base for the specification of the anatomy of Archimate (Lankhorst et al, 2010), a similar effort to ours. In (Ferreira et al, 2008) a relation between Adaptive Object Model pattern and the MOF standard is presented, where run-time instances of the operational level are equivalent to MOF's M0 and knowledge level; classes, attributes, relations and behavior is equivalent to M1, being M2 an equivalent to the models used to define an AOM. As in the work of Ferreira et al, in our UEAOM all these MOF levels are projected as run-time instances.…”
Section: The Universal Enterprise Adaptive Object Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%