2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns and causes of uncertainty in the American Community Survey

Abstract: In 2010 the American Community Survey (ACS) replaced the long form of the United States decennial census. The ACS is now the principal source of high-resolution geographic information about the U.S. population. The margins of error on ACS census tract-level data are on average 75 percent larger than those of the corresponding 2000 long-form estimate. The practical implications of this increase is that data are sometimes so imprecise that they are difficult to use. This paper explains why the ACS tract and bloc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
141
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This aligns with life course analysis that shows people gain income after age 18 and peak around age 65 before starting to decline again (Tamborini, Kim, and Sakamoto 2015). We acknowledge the uncertainty inherent in ACS data (Spielman, Folch, and Nagle 2014), but contend that our analysis may underestimate poverty rates (Bazuin and Fraser 2013). Our assumption of constant enrollment rates, which assumes "stalled development" is likely an overestimate of the proportion of the future population with low educational attainment (KC and Lutz 2014), however, projecting multiple scenarios of future educational attainment was beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Low Education and Poverty Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This aligns with life course analysis that shows people gain income after age 18 and peak around age 65 before starting to decline again (Tamborini, Kim, and Sakamoto 2015). We acknowledge the uncertainty inherent in ACS data (Spielman, Folch, and Nagle 2014), but contend that our analysis may underestimate poverty rates (Bazuin and Fraser 2013). Our assumption of constant enrollment rates, which assumes "stalled development" is likely an overestimate of the proportion of the future population with low educational attainment (KC and Lutz 2014), however, projecting multiple scenarios of future educational attainment was beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Low Education and Poverty Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In the United States there are large margins of error in the ACS data at the block group level, and there are arguments for using data at the census track level (Spielman et al 2014, Bazuin & Frazier 2013, even though there is a loss in spatial precision when units are overlaid on exposure categories. 7 Thus, the highest resolution units introduce uncertainty owing to the small household sample sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ACS estimates at the census block group scale are based on a much lower sample size than the decennial census. This results in a high margin of error that makes the ACS estimates unreliable for many variables (Spielman et al 2014). …”
Section: Identifying Social Vulnerability Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%