2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5lc00626k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterning microfluidic device wettability with spatially-controlled plasma oxidation

Abstract: Microfluidic devices can form double emulsions with uniform properties, but require cumbersome fabrication steps to pattern their wettability. We demonstrate spatially-controlled plasma oxidation to create wettability patterns for forming double emulsions. Our method performs comparably to chemical techniques but is simpler, more reliable, and scalable to patterning large arrays of drop makers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PDMS devices were bonded to PDMS slabs by treating both with oxygen plasma for 60 s at 1 mbar of pressure in a plasma cleaner. Bonded devices were incubated at 65 °C for 36–48 hours prior to use38.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDMS devices were bonded to PDMS slabs by treating both with oxygen plasma for 60 s at 1 mbar of pressure in a plasma cleaner. Bonded devices were incubated at 65 °C for 36–48 hours prior to use38.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microfluidic devices are fabricated using soft lithography in poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) [25]. SU-8 masters are fabricated by photolithography and used to mold PDMS devices by mixing PDMS polymer and cross-linker at a ratio of 11:1, pouring over the master, degassing to remove air bubbles, and baking at 75 o C for 4 h to solidify.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDMS), but modification of the surface is still needed in order to i) further increase or decrease the contact angle between the solid of the channel walls and the working fluids (Jankowski et al, 2013); ii) pattern the device with hydrophobic (or hydrophilic) areas in order to, e.g. produce multiple droplets (Abate et al, 2010b;Kim S.C. et al, 2015); iii) shield the microchannel walls from the deposition of unwanted molecules and from the intake of swelling solvents (Abate et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2003;Zhou et al, 2012); or to iv) increase the adherence of the mammalian cells to the solid substrate (Zuchowska et al, 2016). Easy and durable methods for the modification of the microchannels in PDMS and hybrid PDMS glass devices are available.…”
Section: Surface Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hydrophilic modification by acrylic monomer that can bind to the glassy sol-gel coating (Abate et al, 2010b). Alternatively, the device can be patterned by treating parts of the microfluidic channel network with oxygen plasma or corona discharge-ionized oxygen species produced in those processes bombard the exposed PDMS surface and oxidize the surface, rendering the natively hydrophobic PDMS hydrophilic (Filla et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2015).…”
Section: Surface Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%