1998
DOI: 10.1021/la9710482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterned Protein Layers on Solid Substrates by Thin Stamp Microcontact Printing

Abstract: Microcontact printing (µCP) is a new method of molecularly patterning surfaces on a micrometer scale. In this paper, we present the extension of microcontact printing to producing patterned layers of proteins on solid substrates. µCP avoids the use of strong acids and bases necessary in photolithographic patterning, allowing its use for patterning of proteins and other biological layers. We also describe the methods of thin stamp microcontact printing that allow printing of isolated features previously unattai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
202
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
202
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PDMS layers between 220 µm and 1 mm thick were able form a good seal with the polystyrene substrate but were not so thick that the microchannels collapsed. 13 …”
Section: Experimental Section Design and Fabrication Of Capillary Masksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDMS layers between 220 µm and 1 mm thick were able form a good seal with the polystyrene substrate but were not so thick that the microchannels collapsed. 13 …”
Section: Experimental Section Design and Fabrication Of Capillary Masksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resists made of SAMs can also be used as masks for isotropic wet etchants on a limited set of substrates (mainly, Originally demonstrated for alkanethiol inks transferred on gold for producing patterns of SAMs, 11 the principle works also for the transfer of dried proteins from PDMS to various surfaces, as demonstrated by three groups simultaneously. [23][24][25] Although microstamping of proteins represents a protein immobilization protocol (based on contact transfer of a dry layer) that departs substantially from the traditional one (based on deposition from solution), it is experimentally simple and allows for greater flexibility and resolution than microfluidic patterning. Alignment of two non-overlapping protein patterns is facilitated by the use of a single multilevel stamp.…”
Section: Iib Micromachining (Etching and Deposition)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study cell contact guidance in simultaneous presence of a topographic and an adhesive cue, Britland et al 90 presented BHK fibroblasts with grooves of various depths (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 3.0, and 6.0 μm deep) together with pitch-matched aminosilane tracks of various widths (5,12,25,50, and 100 μm wide) at parallel and orthogonally opposed directions. They found that cell alignment was profoundly enhanced on all surfaces that presented both cues in parallel; cells were able to switch alignment from ridges to grooves, and vice versa, depending on the location of superimposed adhesive tracks; cells aligned preferentially to adhesive tracks superimposed orthogonally over grooves of matched pitch, traversing numerous grooves and ridges.…”
Section: Effect Of Microtopography On Fibroblastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, nearly 100% of the protein film transfers from the stamp onto the surface being patterned, presumably due to favorable interactions between the exposed protein film surface and the substrate to which the film is transferred. Some printed protein fields have also shown largely unaltered epitope presentation in antibody immunostaining assays [107,108]. It has been demonstrated that stamped protein fields retain sufficient activity to promote the levels of cell adhesion and phenotypic expression found for the same cell-protein systems where the protein was deposited by adsorption.…”
Section: Protein μCp Stamping and μFn Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%