2022
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11132060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern Reconstruction of 3-D Modular Antennas by Means of a Non-Redundant Near-Field Spherical Scan

Abstract: A very flexible source model is proposed here to reduce the volumetric redundancy when considering the pattern reconstruction of three-dimensional modular antennas by means of a near-field spherical scan using a non-redundant sampling representation. Since this last facet is based on the appropriate choice of antenna model for the evaluation of the optimal parameters to be used, the proposed geometry guaranteed the minimum number of needed samples and then a significant time saved for data acquisition on the n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined AUT of the equivalent problem can be considered a volumetric antenna, whose encumbrance has one or two predominant dimensions as compared to the other one(s), depending on the shape of the original antenna and its distance from the PEC ground. In order to choose the modelling surface Σ M able to best fit the real geometry of the combined AUT, whatever its encumbrance, the very adaptable surface proposed in [34] can be conveniently employed. Due to the geometry of the equivalent problem, the here adopted one bounds a central cylindrical body of radius a and height h c , which ends into two circular bowls with same aperture radii a and lateral bending radii c (see Figure 2b).…”
Section: Sampling Representation Over the Upper Hemispherementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The combined AUT of the equivalent problem can be considered a volumetric antenna, whose encumbrance has one or two predominant dimensions as compared to the other one(s), depending on the shape of the original antenna and its distance from the PEC ground. In order to choose the modelling surface Σ M able to best fit the real geometry of the combined AUT, whatever its encumbrance, the very adaptable surface proposed in [34] can be conveniently employed. Due to the geometry of the equivalent problem, the here adopted one bounds a central cylindrical body of radius a and height h c , which ends into two circular bowls with same aperture radii a and lateral bending radii c (see Figure 2b).…”
Section: Sampling Representation Over the Upper Hemispherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ℓ ′ is the length of the curve C ′ , obtained by intersecting the meridian plane passing through Q with Σ M and equal to 2[h c + (a − c) + πc], and λ the wavelength. Then, the optimal parameter τ and phase function γ are [33,34]:…”
Section: Sampling Representation Over the Upper Hemispherementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations