2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2019.8779539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern recognition and direct control home use of a multi-articulating hand prosthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large number of pattern recognition (PR) approaches have been developed over the years aiming to increase the functionality and control of more dexterous prostheses [3][4][5] . Despite these efforts, PR-based prostheses have not managed to deliver their full potential in practical clinical applications 6,7 . One of the primary causes is that they are sensitive to the variability of sEMG, limiting the robustness and reliability in long-term practical applications 4,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] .…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of pattern recognition (PR) approaches have been developed over the years aiming to increase the functionality and control of more dexterous prostheses [3][4][5] . Despite these efforts, PR-based prostheses have not managed to deliver their full potential in practical clinical applications 6,7 . One of the primary causes is that they are sensitive to the variability of sEMG, limiting the robustness and reliability in long-term practical applications 4,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] .…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study at-home prosthetic use, previous take-home systems have stored limited usage data, including the time the device was turned on (Graczyk et al, 2018;Simon et al, 2019), aggregated hand movement (Simon et al, 2019), how often FIGURE 6 | Transradial amputee performed supervised activities of daily living, of his own choice, at home using the portable take-home system. Images show the participant (A) turning faucet in the bathroom; (B) locking the dead-bolt on the front door; a bi-manual task not possible with his commercial prosthesis; (C) opening the mail box; and (D) retrieving water from the refrigerator.…”
Section: Failedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…including limited number of pre-determined grips, temporal delay due to sequential inputs used to 32 select grips, fixed output force (e.g., from classifier algorithms), extensive training that lasts days to 33 This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article weeks, and non-intuitive methods of control (e.g., inertial measurement units (IMUs) on residual 34 limb or feet) ( or direct control algorithms have been studied at home (Pasquina et al, 2015;Simon et al, 2019). 40 However, a Kalman filter (Wu et al, 2006), modified with non-linear, ad-hoc adjustments (Jacob A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 2018; Hargrove et al, 2017; L. Resnik et al, 2017; L. J. Resnik, Acluche, Borgia, et al, 2018). 252However, these approaches only approximate actual prosthesis use and could be misinterpreted.253 Some pattern recognition studies have recorded kinematic output and use of predefined grasps 254(Kuiken et al, 2016;Simon et al, 2019). 255An important aspect of the portable system is the fast computation of position updates using a steady-256 state Kalman filter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%