2002
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern recognition and call preferences in treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): a quantitative analysis using a no-choice paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
120
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
120
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Independent of the signaller strategy, a non-linear relationship between the quality and the perceived attractiveness of males may arise by a non-linear response of the females' neuro-sensory system to the variation in signal property. For example, in Hyla versicolor, it has been shown that the strength of the preference for the longer of two calls decreases with the increase of the call durations presented (Gerhardt et al 2000), suggesting that the strength of attraction of a call increased logarithmically with increasing call duration (Bush et al 2002). For these reasons, now we relax the assumption of linearity between mate quality and attractiveness and we investigate how alternative monotonic attractiveness functions may affect the optimal female mating strategy.…”
Section: The Effects Of Costs On Female Mating Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Independent of the signaller strategy, a non-linear relationship between the quality and the perceived attractiveness of males may arise by a non-linear response of the females' neuro-sensory system to the variation in signal property. For example, in Hyla versicolor, it has been shown that the strength of the preference for the longer of two calls decreases with the increase of the call durations presented (Gerhardt et al 2000), suggesting that the strength of attraction of a call increased logarithmically with increasing call duration (Bush et al 2002). For these reasons, now we relax the assumption of linearity between mate quality and attractiveness and we investigate how alternative monotonic attractiveness functions may affect the optimal female mating strategy.…”
Section: The Effects Of Costs On Female Mating Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically, this means that they should be able to describe the preference function Ã(z). Several of these methods have been proposed (review in Wagner 1998; Bush et al 2002;Phelps et al 2006). In particular, we focus on three methods: the one-choice recognition test, the forced two-choice discrimination test and the latency-ratio test (Bush et al 2002).…”
Section: The Attractiveness Function Proper Can Be Written Now As A(qmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations