2024
DOI: 10.1007/s44197-024-00219-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern of Virtual Consultations in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: An Epidemiological Nationwide Study

Reem S. AlOmar,
Muaddi AlHarbi,
Nijr S. Alotaibi
et al.

Abstract: Background In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), little is known about the adoption of virtual consultations (VCs), with most studies being survey-based leading to varying results. This study aims to utilise secondary collected data on the use of both kinds of VCs currently available, and to epidemiologically describe the adoption of these consultations. Methods This retrospective study analysed data provided by the Ministry of Health between January 1st 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a few participants expressed negative opinions about virtual health appointments, this population tended to be younger, lived in urban settings, attended specialty clinics (especially psychiatry), used the Sehhaty app, already preferred in-person consultations, and had consultations by telephone. Over an eighteen-month period in 2021 and 2022, over a million virtual consultations were delivered to the population of the KSA [9]; assuming that the virtual consultations remained constant after this time (i.e., ~55,000 virtual consultations a month), our sample represents about 0.5% of the population attending virtual consultations. Given this sample size and that the age (relatively young) and sex profile (female predominance) reflected that of the individuals seeking virtual consultations from population-level administrative data [9], our results are likely to be representative of the overall population attending virtual consultations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although a few participants expressed negative opinions about virtual health appointments, this population tended to be younger, lived in urban settings, attended specialty clinics (especially psychiatry), used the Sehhaty app, already preferred in-person consultations, and had consultations by telephone. Over an eighteen-month period in 2021 and 2022, over a million virtual consultations were delivered to the population of the KSA [9]; assuming that the virtual consultations remained constant after this time (i.e., ~55,000 virtual consultations a month), our sample represents about 0.5% of the population attending virtual consultations. Given this sample size and that the age (relatively young) and sex profile (female predominance) reflected that of the individuals seeking virtual consultations from population-level administrative data [9], our results are likely to be representative of the overall population attending virtual consultations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has limitations. As noted above, convenience sampling is inherently biased, and the results relate directly to the study population; nevertheless, this was a relatively large sample with an age and sex profile (female predominance) reflecting that of those seeking virtual consultations from the population-level administrative data [9], thus potentiating that the results are more likely to be generalizable to the wider population. Three-quarters of the population of the KSA are aged between 15 and 74 years [1,2]; that is, the population is relatively young, so, given that older people might face increased barriers to technology use [35], the results may not be generalizable to countries with older populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation