2022
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern of Papulosquamous Disorders in Children: A Clinico-Epidemiological Study

Abstract: IntroductionSkin disorders are a major health problem in the pediatric age group and are associated with significant morbidity. Papulosquamous disorders, forming a major part of the skin diseases in children, present in a variety of clinical pattern. This study is conducted in order to study the hospital-based prevalence of papulosquamous disorders in the pediatric age group (2-14 years) and to determine the morphology and clinical patterns with respect to their age and sex distribution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis included 121 studies to calculate the pooled global prevalence of seborrheic dermatitis. These studies encompassed 1 260 163 participants with clinician-diagnosed seborrheic dermatitis, uncovering an overall pooled prevalence of 4.38% (95% CI, 3.58%-5.17%) with an IQR of 1.55% to 5.45%, alongside significant statistical heterogeneity ( I 2 = 99.94%; df = 120; Q = 38 414.25) (Table, Figure 2, Figure 3). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of this prevalence estimate, showing minimal variation in the sequential exclusion of individual studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis included 121 studies to calculate the pooled global prevalence of seborrheic dermatitis. These studies encompassed 1 260 163 participants with clinician-diagnosed seborrheic dermatitis, uncovering an overall pooled prevalence of 4.38% (95% CI, 3.58%-5.17%) with an IQR of 1.55% to 5.45%, alongside significant statistical heterogeneity ( I 2 = 99.94%; df = 120; Q = 38 414.25) (Table, Figure 2, Figure 3). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of this prevalence estimate, showing minimal variation in the sequential exclusion of individual studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%