2020
DOI: 10.9734/jammr/2020/v32i230363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern of Obstetric Clinic Attendance, Deliveries and Neonatal Outcome at a Tertiary Hospital during and after a Free Medical Care Programme

Abstract: Background: Policies and programs aimed at giving access to healthcare free of charge for some segments of the population are increasingly being put in place by low and middle-income countries. The impact of such policies has so far been rather mixed. Objective: This study sought to determine the pattern of obstetrics clinic attendance, deliveries and neonatal outcome during and after a Free Medical Care (FMC) Programme. Was there any significant difference during and after the FMC programme?  Meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in reported findings could be due to peculiarities of the study area. Previously our Centre had reported a high overall CD rate (43.1%) and the commonest indication for CD was previous CD (averaging 30%) in a study by Awoyesuku et al [33] . In the present study, the CD rates were 63.8% and 55.8% in the AMA and control groups respectively, with the difference not significant after multivariate logistics regression analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The differences in reported findings could be due to peculiarities of the study area. Previously our Centre had reported a high overall CD rate (43.1%) and the commonest indication for CD was previous CD (averaging 30%) in a study by Awoyesuku et al [33] . In the present study, the CD rates were 63.8% and 55.8% in the AMA and control groups respectively, with the difference not significant after multivariate logistics regression analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%